Hanging in the Balance: Pivotal Moments in Crisis Counseling Conversations
Vivian Nguyen, Lillian Lee, Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil
Abstract
During a conversation, there can come certain moments where its outcome hangs in the balance. In these pivotal moments, how one responds can put the conversation on substantially different trajectories leading to significantly different outcomes. Systems that can detect when such moments arise could assist conversationalists in domains with highly consequential outcomes, such as mental health crisis counseling. In this work, we introduce an unsupervised computational method for detecting such pivotal moments as they happen, in an online fashion. Our approach relies on the intuition that a moment is pivotal if our expectation of the outcome varies widely depending on what might be said next. By applying our method to crisis counseling conversations, we first validate it by showing that it aligns with human perception -- counselors take significantly longer to respond during moments detected by our method -- and with the eventual conversational trajectory -- which is more likely to change course at these times. We then use our framework to explore the relation of the counselor's response during pivotal moments with the eventual outcome of the session.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4fef637e-7b80-40ef-a9b8-58927c88d5dbCited by top-tier papers2
- Responsible Evaluation of AI for Mental HealthHiba Arnaout, Anmol Goel, H. Andrew Schwartz, Steffen Eberhardt et al.ACL 2026
- Wait! There's a Way Out: A Decision Mechanism for Forecasting Conversational DerailmentLaerdon Kim, Vivian Nguyen, Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-MizilACL 2026
Builds on5
- Balancing Objectives in Counseling Conversations: Advancing Forwards or Looking BackwardsJustine Zhang, Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-MizilACL 2020 · 35 citations
- Thread With Caution: Proactively Helping Users Assess and Deescalate Tension in Their Online DiscussionsJonathan P. Chang, Charlotte Schluger, Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-MizilCSCW 2022 · 27 citations
- A Computational Approach to Understanding Empathy Expressed in Text-Based Mental Health SupportAshish Sharma, Adam S. Miner, David C. Atkins, Tim AlthoffEMNLP 2020 · 21 citations
- Helping the Helper : Supporting Peer Counselors via AI-Empowered Practice and FeedbackShang-Ling Hsu, Raj Sanjay Shah, Prathik Senthil, Zahra Ashktorab et al.CSCW 2025 · 20 citations
- The Practice of Online Peer Counseling and the Potential for AI-Powered Support ToolsTony Wang, Amy S. Bruckman, Diyi YangCSCW 2025 · 7 citations
Related papers
- Logic-driven Indirect Supervision: An Application to Crisis CounselingMattia Medina Grespan, Meghan Broadbent, Xinyao Zhang, Katherine Axford et al.ACL 2023 · 1 citation
- "If This Person is Suicidal, What Do I Do?": Designing Computational Approaches to Help Online Volunteers Respond to SuicidalityLogan Stapleton, Sunniva Liu, Cindy Liu, Irene Hong et al.CHI 2024 · 15 citations
- Assessing effective de-escalation of crisis conversations using transformer-based models and trend statisticsIgnacio J. Tripodi, Greg Buda, Margaret Meagher, Elizabeth A. OlsonEMNLP 2025
- Metrics for Peer Counseling: Triangulating Success Outcomes for Online Therapy PlatformsTony Wang, Haard K. Shah, Raj Sanjay Shah, Yi-Chia Wang et al.CHI 2023 · 15 citations
- Response-act Guided Reinforced Dialogue Generation for Mental Health CounselingAseem Srivastava, Ishan Pandey, Md. Shad Akhtar, Tanmoy ChakrabortyWWW 2023 · 22 citations
