Null-Shot Prompting: Rethinking Prompting Large Language Models With Hallucination
Pittawat Taveekitworachai, Febri Abdullah, Ruck Thawonmas
Abstract
This paper investigates an interesting phenomenon where we observe performance increases in large language models (LLMs) when providing a prompt that causes and exploits hallucination.We propose null-shot prompting, a counter-intuitive approach where we deliberately instruct LLMs to reference a null, nonexistent, section.We evaluate null-shot prompting across a variety of tasks, including arithmetic reasoning, commonsense reasoning, and reading comprehension.Notably, we observe a substantial increase in performance in arithmetic reasoning tasks for various models, with up to a 44.62% increase compared to a baseline in one model.Additional experiments on more complex mathematical problem-solving and hallucination detection benchmarks also reveal similar benefits from this approach.Furthermore, we explore the effects of combining reasoning, which typically mitigates hallucination, with hallucination within the prompt and find several cases of performance improvements.We hope this paper stimulates further interest, investigation, and discussion on how hallucination in prompts may not only affect LLMs but, in certain cases, enhance their performance.GPT-4 Turbo -0.79% -5.35% -0.9% 1.22% -8.48% -4.08% -11.54%Claude 2.1 -8.53% -7.46% -7.81% -3.81% -6.36% 0.88% 11.11% Claude 3 Haiku -4.94% -1.22% 5.75% 2.34% -4.84% 3.01% 3.88% Claude 3 Sonnet 0.9% 1.59% -7.58% -3.7% -12.9% -0.65% -3.74% Claude 3 Opus -1.87% -2.35%
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4fa57811-a92a-4f2e-b8e5-5087461c809fCited by top-tier papers5
- What Makes a Good Natural Language Prompt?Do Xuan Long, Duy Dinh, Ngoc-Hai Nguyen, Kenji Kawaguchi et al.ACL 2025 · 13 citations
- A Survey of Deep Learning for Geometry Problem SolvingJianzhe Ma, Wenxuan Wang, Qin JinACL 2026 · 5 citations
- Critical Confabulation: Can LLMs Hallucinate for Social Good?Peiqi Sui, Eamon Duede, Hoyt Long, Richard Jean SoICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- SAEs Are Good for Steering - If You Select the Right FeaturesDana Arad, Aaron Mueller, Yonatan BelinkovEMNLP 2025
- Prior Prompt Engineering for Reinforcement Fine-TuningPittawat Taveekitworachai, Potsawee Manakul, Sarana Nutanong, Kunat PipatanakulEMNLP 2025
Builds on20
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use ToolsTimo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessì, Roberta Raileanu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,989 citations
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
- WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at ScaleKeisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, Yejin ChoiAAAI 2020 · 3,037 citations
Related papers
- Query-Dependent Prompt Evaluation and Optimization with Offline Inverse RLHao Sun, Alihan Hüyük, Mihaela van der SchaarICLR 2024 · 48 citations
- Agent Instructs Large Language Models to be General Zero-Shot ReasonersNicholas Crispino, Kyle Montgomery, Fankun Zeng, Dawn Song et al.ICML 2024 · 41 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language ModelsLei Wang, Wanyu Xu, Yihuai Lan, Zhiqiang Hu et al.ACL 2023 · 249 citations
- Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent DebateYilun Du, Shuang Li, Antonio Torralba, Joshua B. Tenenbaum et al.ICML 2024 · 1,562 citations
