Adaptive Data Debiasing through Bounded Exploration
Yifan Yang, Yang Liu, Parinaz Naghizadeh
Abstract
Biases in existing datasets used to train algorithmic decision rules can raise ethical and economic concerns due to the resulting disparate treatment of different groups. We propose an algorithm for sequentially debiasing such datasets through adaptive and bounded exploration in a classification problem with costly and censored feedback. Exploration in this context means that at times, and to a judiciously-chosen extent, the decision maker deviates from its (current) loss-minimizing rule, and instead accepts some individuals that would otherwise be rejected, so as to reduce statistical data biases. Our proposed algorithm includes parameters that can be used to balance between the ultimate goal of removing data biases -- which will in turn lead to more accurate and fair decisions, and the exploration risks incurred to achieve this goal. We analytically show that such exploration can help debias data in certain distributions. We further investigate how fairness criteria can work in conjunction with our data debiasing algorithm. We illustrate the performance of our algorithm using experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- Fair Classification with Partial Feedback: An Exploration-Based Data Collection ApproachVijay Keswani, Anay Mehrotra, L. Elisa CelisICML 2024 · 3 citations
- Learning with Selectively Labeled Data from Multiple Decision-makersJian Chen, Zhehao Li, Xiaojie MaoICML 2025
Builds on7
- Performative PredictionJuan C. Perdomo, Tijana Zrnic, Celestine Mendler-Dünner, Moritz HardtICML 2020 · 422 citations
- Achieving Fairness in the Stochastic Multi-Armed Bandit ProblemVishakha Patil, Ganesh Ghalme, Vineet Nair, Y. NarahariAAAI 2020 · 131 citations
- Active Sampling for Min-Max FairnessJacob D. Abernethy, Pranjal Awasthi, Matthäus Kleindessner, Jamie Morgenstern et al.ICML 2022 · 57 citations
- The Rich Get Richer: Disparate Impact of Semi-Supervised LearningZhaowei Zhu, Tianyi Luo, Yang LiuICLR 2022 · 44 citations
- Unintended Selection: Persistent Qualification Rate Disparities and InterventionsReilly Raab, Yang LiuNeurIPS 2021 · 27 citations
Related papers
- Social Bias Meets Data Bias: The Impacts of Labeling and Measurement Errors on Fairness CriteriaYiqiao Liao, Parinaz NaghizadehAAAI 2023 · 15 citations
- On the Fairness of Causal Algorithmic RecourseJulius von Kügelgen, Amir-Hossein Karimi, Umang Bhatt, Isabel Valera et al.AAAI 2022 · 99 citations
- Desirable Effort Fairness and Optimality Trade-offs in Strategic LearningValia Efthymiou, Ekaterina Fedorova, Chara PodimataICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Adapting Fairness Interventions to Missing ValuesRaymond Feng, Flávio P. Calmon, Hao WangNeurIPS 2023 · 20 citations
- Fair Sequential Selection Using Supervised Learning ModelsMohammad Mahdi Khalili, Xueru Zhang, Mahed AbroshanNeurIPS 2021 · 25 citations
