Decoupled Rationalization with Asymmetric Learning Rates: A Flexible Lipschitz Restraint
Wei Liu, Jun Wang, Haozhao Wang, Ruixuan Li, Yang Qiu, Yuankai Zhang, Jie Han, Yixiong Zou
Abstract
A self-explaining rationalization model is generally constructed by a cooperative game where a generator selects the most humanintelligible pieces from the input text as rationales, followed by a predictor that makes predictions based on the selected rationales. However, such a cooperative game may incur the degeneration problem where the predictor overfits to the uninformative pieces generated by a not yet well-trained generator and in turn, leads the generator to converge to a sub-optimal model that tends to select senseless pieces. In this paper, we theoretically bridge degeneration with the predictor's Lipschitz continuity. Then, we empirically propose a simple but effective method named DR, which can naturally and flexibly restrain the Lipschitz constant of the predictor, to address the problem of degeneration. The main idea of DR is to decouple the generator and predictor to allocate them with asymmetric learning rates. A series of experiments conducted on two widely used benchmarks have verified the effectiveness of the proposed method. Codes: https://github.com/jugechengzi/Rationalization-DR . CCS CONCEPTS • Computing methodologies → Machine learning; Natural language processing; • Mathematics of computing → Mathematical analysis.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4e277c3d-0b85-457f-a459-c3f7b1ccdd5eCited by top-tier papers10
- D-Separation for Causal Self-ExplanationWei Liu, Jun Wang, Haozhao Wang, Ruixuan Li et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 29 citations
- Tailoring Self-Rationalizers with Multi-Reward DistillationSahana Ramnath, Brihi Joshi, Skyler Hallinan, Ximing Lu et al.ICLR 2024 · 23 citations
- Is the MMI Criterion Necessary for Interpretability? Degenerating Non-causal Features to Plain Noise for Self-RationalizationWei Liu, Zhiying Deng, Zhongyu Niu, Jun Wang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 17 citations
- MGR: Multi-generator Based RationalizationWei Liu, Haozhao Wang, Jun Wang, Ruixuan Li et al.ACL 2023 · 7 citations
- MARE: Multi-Aspect Rationale Extractor on Unsupervised Rationale ExtractionHan Jiang, Junwen Duan, Zhe Qu, Jianxin WangEMNLP 2024 · 2 citations
Builds on14
- ELECTRA: Pre-training Text Encoders as Discriminators Rather Than GeneratorsKevin Clark, Minh-Thang Luong, Quoc V. Le, Christopher D. ManningICLR 2020 · 541 citations
- Invariant RationalizationShiyu Chang, Yang Zhang, Mo Yu, Tommi S. JaakkolaICML 2020 · 232 citations
- Bi-Level Actor-Critic for Multi-Agent CoordinationHaifeng Zhang, Weizhe Chen, Zeren Huang, Minne Li et al.AAAI 2020 · 113 citations
- Rethinking Lipschitz Neural Networks and Certified Robustness: A Boolean Function PerspectiveBohang Zhang, Du Jiang, Di He, Liwei WangNeurIPS 2022 · 88 citations
- Gradient Normalization for Generative Adversarial NetworksYi-Lun Wu, Hong-Han Shuai, Zhi Rui Tam, Hong-Yu ChiuICCV 2021 · 78 citations
Related papers
- Enhancing the Rationale-Input Alignment for Self-explaining RationalizationWei Liu, Haozhao Wang, Jun Wang, Zhiying Deng et al.ICDE 2024 · 6 citations
- Learning Robust Rationales for Model Explainability: A Guidance-Based ApproachShuaibo Hu, Kui YuAAAI 2024 · 11 citations
- Adversarial Cooperative Rationalization: The Risk of Spurious Correlations in Even Clean DatasetsWei Liu, Zhongyu Niu, Lang Gao, Zhiying Deng et al.ICML 2025
- FR: Folded Rationalization with a Unified EncoderWei Liu, Haozhao Wang, Jun Wang, Ruixuan Li et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 33 citations
- Boosting Explainability through Selective Rationalization in Pre-trained Language ModelsLibing Yuan, Shuaibo Hu, Kui Yu, Le WuKDD 2025 · 1 citation
