MARE: Multi-Aspect Rationale Extractor on Unsupervised Rationale Extraction
Han Jiang, Junwen Duan, Zhe Qu, Jianxin Wang
Abstract
Unsupervised rationale extraction aims to extract text snippets to support model predictions without explicit rationale annotation. Researchers have made many efforts to solve this task. Previous works often encode each aspect independently, which may limit their ability to capture meaningful internal correlations between aspects. While there has been significant work on mitigating spurious correlations, our approach focuses on leveraging the beneficial internal correlations to improve multi-aspect rationale extraction. In this paper, we propose a Multi-Aspect Rationale Extractor (MARE) to explain and predict multiple aspects simultaneously. Concretely, we propose a Multi-Aspect Multi-Head Attention (MAMHA) mechanism based on hard deletion to encode multiple text chunks simultaneously. Furthermore, multiple special tokens are prepended in front of the text with each corresponding to one certain aspect. Finally, multi-task training is deployed to reduce the training overhead. Experimental results on two unsupervised rationale extraction benchmarks show that MARE achieves state-ofthe-art performance. Ablation studies further demonstrate the effectiveness of our method. Our codes have been available at https:// github.com/CSU-NLP-Group/MARE .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cd6ce3b8-e2ea-4b5b-af73-70160aa3c11bCited by top-tier papers2
- Is the MMI Criterion Necessary for Interpretability? Degenerating Non-causal Features to Plain Noise for Self-RationalizationWei Liu, Zhiying Deng, Zhongyu Niu, Jun Wang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 17 citations
- Learn from A Rationalist: Distilling Intermediate Interpretable RationalesJiayi Dai, Randy GoebelICML 2026
Builds on8
- Invariant RationalizationShiyu Chang, Yang Zhang, Mo Yu, Tommi S. JaakkolaICML 2020 · 232 citations
- Understanding Interlocking Dynamics of Cooperative RationalizationMo Yu, Yang Zhang, Shiyu Chang, Tommi S. JaakkolaNeurIPS 2021 · 52 citations
- FR: Folded Rationalization with a Unified EncoderWei Liu, Haozhao Wang, Jun Wang, Ruixuan Li et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 33 citations
- Distribution Matching for RationalizationYongfeng Huang, Yujun Chen, Yulun Du, Zhilin YangAAAI 2021 · 21 citations
- Multi-Dimensional Explanation of Target Variables from DocumentsDiego Antognini, Claudiu Musat, Boi FaltingsAAAI 2021 · 14 citations
Related papers
- QUASER: Question Answering with Scalable Extractive RationalizationAsish Ghoshal, Srinivasan Iyer, Bhargavi Paranjape, Kushal Lakhotia et al.SIGIR 2022 · 2 citations
- UNIREX: A Unified Learning Framework for Language Model Rationale ExtractionAaron Chan, Maziar Sanjabi, Lambert Mathias, Liang Tan et al.ICML 2022 · 48 citations
- Hop, Union, Generate: Explainable Multi-hop Reasoning without Rationale SupervisionWenting Zhao, Justin T. Chiu, Claire Cardie, Alexander M. RushEMNLP 2023 · 4 citations
- Exploring Self-Distillation Based Relational Reasoning Training for Document-Level Relation ExtractionLiang Zhang, Jinsong Su, Zijun Min, Zhongjian Miao et al.AAAI 2023 · 15 citations
- Making a (Counterfactual) Difference One Rationale at a TimeMitchell Plyler, Michael Green, Min ChiNeurIPS 2021 · 12 citations
