Persua: A Visual Interactive System to Enhance the Persuasiveness of Arguments in Online Discussion
Meng Xia, Qian Zhu, Xingbo Wang, Fei Nie, Huamin Qu, Xiaojuan Ma
Abstract
Persuading people to change their opinions is a common practice in online discussion forums on topics ranging from political campaigns to relationship consultation. Enhancing people's ability to write persuasive arguments could not only practice their critical thinking and reasoning but also contribute to the effectiveness and civility in online communication. It is, however, not an easy task in online discussion settings where written words are the primary communication channel. In this paper, we derived four design goals for a tool that helps users improve the persuasiveness of arguments in online discussions through a survey with 123 online forum users and interviews with five debating experts. To satisfy these design goals, we analyzed and built a labeled dataset of fine-grained persuasive strategies (i.e., logos, pathos, ethos, and evidence) in 164 arguments with high ratings on persuasiveness from ChangeMyView, a popular online discussion forum. We then designed an interactive visual system, Persua, which provides example-based guidance on persuasive strategies to enhance the persuasiveness of arguments. In particular, the system constructs portfolios of arguments based on different persuasive strategies applied to a given discussion topic. It then presents concrete examples based on the difference between the portfolios of user input and high-quality arguments in the dataset. A between-subjects study shows suggestive evidence that Persua encourages users to submit more times for feedback and helps users improve more on the persuasiveness of their arguments than a baseline system. Finally, a set of design considerations was summarized to guide future intelligent systems that improve the persuasiveness in text.
• Computing methodologies → Natural language processing; • Human-centered computing → Interactive systems and tools.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4e0ad9db-46b9-4f56-9b19-382fc9491571Cited by top-tier papers12
- VISAR: A Human-AI Argumentative Writing Assistant with Visual Programming and Rapid Draft PrototypingZheng Zhang, Jie Gao, Ranjodh Singh Dhaliwal, Toby Jia-Jun LiUIST 2023 · 101 citations
- LessonPlanner: Assisting Novice Teachers to Prepare Pedagogy-Driven Lesson Plans with Large Language ModelsHaoxiang Fan, Guanzheng Chen, Xingbo Wang, Zhenhui PengUIST 2024 · 35 citations
- Storyfier: Exploring Vocabulary Learning Support with Text Generation ModelsZhenhui Peng, Xingbo Wang, Qiushi Han, Junkai Zhu et al.UIST 2023 · 26 citations
- "Ronaldo's a poser!": How the Use of Generative AI Shapes Debates in Online ForumsYuhan Zeng, Yingxuan Shi, Xuehan Huang, Fiona Nah et al.CHI 2025 · 21 citations
- Improving Students Argumentation Learning with Adaptive Self-Evaluation NudgingThiemo Wambsganss, Andreas Janson, Tanja Käser, Jan Marco LeimeisterCSCW 2022 · 20 citations
Builds on7
- Re-examining Whether, Why, and How Human-AI Interaction Is Uniquely Difficult to DesignQian Yang, Aaron Steinfeld, Carolyn P. Rosé, John ZimmermanCHI 2020 · 604 citations
- ArgueTutor: An Adaptive Dialog-Based Learning System for Argumentation SkillsThiemo Wambsganss, Tobias Kueng, Matthias Söllner, Jan Marco LeimeisterCHI 2021 · 126 citations
- AL: An Adaptive Learning Support System for Argumentation SkillsThiemo Wambsganss, Christina Niklaus, Matthias Cetto, Matthias Söllner et al.CHI 2020 · 98 citations
- VoiceCoach: Interactive Evidence-based Training for Voice Modulation Skills in Public SpeakingXingbo Wang, Haipeng Zeng, Yong Wang, Aoyu Wu et al.CHI 2020 · 34 citations
- Effective Interfaces for Student-Driven Revision Sessions for Argumentative WritingTazin Afrin, Omid Kashefi, Christopher Olshefski, Diane J. Litman et al.CHI 2021 · 30 citations
Related papers
- SAD: A Large-Scale Strategic Argumentative Dialogue DatasetYongkang Liu, Jiayang Yu, Mingyang Wang, Yiqun Zhang et al.ACL 2026
- Breaking Down the Invisible Wall of Informal Fallacies in Online DiscussionsSaumya Sahai, Oana Balalau, Roxana HorincarACL 2021
- CommSense: Facilitating Bias-Aware and Reflective Navigation of Online Comments for Rational JudgmentYang Ouyang, Shenghan Gao, Ruichuan Wang, Hailiang Zhu et al.CHI 2026 · 2 citations
- In Opinion Holders' Shoes: Modeling Cumulative Influence for View Change in Online ArgumentationZhen Guo, Zhe Zhang, Munindar P. SinghWWW 2020 · 14 citations
- Persuading across Diverse Domains: a Dataset and Persuasion Large Language ModelChuhao Jin, Kening Ren, Lingzhen Kong, Xiting Wang et al.ACL 2024 · 9 citations
