Learning from Demonstration: Provably Efficient Adversarial Policy Imitation with Linear Function Approximation
Zhihan Liu, Yufeng Zhang, Zuyue Fu, Zhuoran Yang, Zhaoran Wang
Abstract
In generative adversarial imitation learning (GAIL), the agent aims to learn a policy from an expert demonstration so that its performance cannot be discriminated from the expert policy on a certain predefined reward set. In this paper, we study GAIL in both online and offline settings with linear function approximation, where both the transition and reward function are linear in the feature maps. Besides the expert demonstration, in the online setting the agent can interact with the environment, while in the offline setting the agent only accesses an additional dataset collected by a prior. For online GAIL, we propose an optimistic generative adversarial policy imitation algorithm (OGAPI) and prove that OGAPI achieves regret. Here represents the number of trajectories of the expert demonstration, is the feature dimension, and is the number of episodes. For offline GAIL, we propose a pessimistic generative adversarial policy imitation algorithm (PGAPI). We also obtain the optimality gap of PGAPI, achieving the minimax lower bound in the utilization of the additional dataset. Assuming sufficient coverage on the additional dataset, we show that PGAPI achieves optimality gap. Here represents the number of trajectories of the additional dataset with sufficient coverage.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4d5dbf66-7abe-4536-bd69-32d1c2339746Cited by top-tier papers10
- Provably Mitigating Overoptimization in RLHF: Your SFT Loss is Implicitly an Adversarial RegularizerZhihan Liu, Miao Lu, Shenao Zhang, Boyi Liu et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 119 citations
- Proximal Point Imitation LearningLuca Viano, Angeliki Kamoutsi, Gergely Neu, Igor Krawczuk et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 27 citations
- Reason for Future, Act for Now: A Principled Architecture for Autonomous LLM AgentsZhihan Liu, Hao Hu, Shenao Zhang, Hongyi Guo et al.ICML 2024 · 17 citations
- Accountability in Offline Reinforcement Learning: Explaining Decisions with a Corpus of ExamplesHao Sun, Alihan Hüyük, Daniel Jarrett, Mihaela van der SchaarNeurIPS 2023 · 13 citations
- Imitation Learning in Discounted Linear MDPs without exploration assumptionsLuca Viano, Stratis Skoulakis, Volkan CevherICML 2024 · 10 citations
Builds on19
- Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningAviral Kumar, Aurick Zhou, George Tucker, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2020 · 2,881 citations
- Is Pessimism Provably Efficient for Offline RL?Ying Jin, Zhuoran Yang, Zhaoran WangICML 2021 · 419 citations
- Critic Regularized RegressionZiyu Wang, Alexander Novikov, Konrad Zolna, Josh Merel et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 406 citations
- Bridging Offline Reinforcement Learning and Imitation Learning: A Tale of PessimismParia Rashidinejad, Banghua Zhu, Cong Ma, Jiantao Jiao et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 373 citations
- Bellman-consistent Pessimism for Offline Reinforcement LearningTengyang Xie, Ching-An Cheng, Nan Jiang, Paul Mineiro et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 339 citations
Related papers
- On Computation and Generalization of Generative Adversarial Imitation LearningMinshuo Chen, Yizhou Wang, Tianyi Liu, Zhuoran Yang et al.ICLR 2020 · 42 citations
- Online Apprenticeship LearningLior Shani, Tom Zahavy, Shie MannorAAAI 2022 · 33 citations
- PN-GAIL: Leveraging Non-optimal Information from Imperfect DemonstrationsQiang Liu, Huiqiao Fu, Kaiqiang Tang, Chunlin Chen et al.ICLR 2025
- Learning to Weight Imperfect DemonstrationsYunke Wang, Chang Xu, Bo Du, Honglak LeeICML 2021 · 57 citations
- Error Bounds of Imitating Policies and EnvironmentsTian Xu, Ziniu Li, Yang YuNeurIPS 2020 · 141 citations
