Lune

FOCS2022Top-tier venue

Simple Hard Instances for Low-Depth Algebraic Proofs

Nashlen Govindasamy, Tuomas Hakoniemi, Iddo Tzameret

2022Year
2Citations
4Top-tier citations

Abstract

We prove super-polynomial lower bounds on the size of propositional proof systems operating with constant-depth algebraic circuits over fields of zero characteristic. Specifically, we show that the subset-sum variant ∑i,j,k,ℓ∈[n]ZiJ′kℓxixjxkxℓ−β=0\displaystyle \sum_{i,j,k,\ell\in[n]}Z_{i_{J}^{\prime}k}\ell x_{i}x_{j}x_{k}x_{\ell}-\beta=0, for Boolean variables, does not have polynomial-size IPS refutations where the refutations are multilinear and written as constant-depth circuits. Andrews and Forbes (STOC’22) established recently a constant-depth IPS lower bound, but their hard instance does not have itself small constant-depth circuits, while our instance is computable already with small depth-2 circuits. Our argument relies on extending the recent breakthrough lower bounds against constant-depth algebraic circuits by Limaye, Srinivasan and Tavenas (FOCS’21) to the functional lower bound framework of Forbes, Shpilka, Tzameret and Wigderson (ToC’21), and may be of independent interest. Specifically, we construct a polynomial f computable with small-size constant-depth circuits, such that the multilinear polynomial computing 1/f1/f over Boolean values and its appropriate set-multilinear projection are hard for constant-depth circuits.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext 4d2df9fb-19db-4246-a139-16941165ffde

Cited by top-tier papers4

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on4

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines