Simple Hard Instances for Low-Depth Algebraic Proofs
Nashlen Govindasamy, Tuomas Hakoniemi, Iddo Tzameret
Abstract
We prove super-polynomial lower bounds on the size of propositional proof systems operating with constant-depth algebraic circuits over fields of zero characteristic. Specifically, we show that the subset-sum variant , for Boolean variables, does not have polynomial-size IPS refutations where the refutations are multilinear and written as constant-depth circuits. Andrews and Forbes (STOC’22) established recently a constant-depth IPS lower bound, but their hard instance does not have itself small constant-depth circuits, while our instance is computable already with small depth-2 circuits. Our argument relies on extending the recent breakthrough lower bounds against constant-depth algebraic circuits by Limaye, Srinivasan and Tavenas (FOCS’21) to the functional lower bound framework of Forbes, Shpilka, Tzameret and Wigderson (ToC’21), and may be of independent interest. Specifically, we construct a polynomial f computable with small-size constant-depth circuits, such that the multilinear polynomial computing over Boolean values and its appropriate set-multilinear projection are hard for constant-depth circuits.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4d2df9fb-19db-4246-a139-16941165ffdeCited by top-tier papers4
- Superpolynomial Lower Bounds Against Low-Depth Algebraic CircuitsNutan Limaye, Srikanth Srinivasan, Sébastien TavenasFOCS 2021 · 26 citations
- Lower Bounds against the Ideal Proof System in Finite FieldsTal Elbaz, Nashlen Govindasamy, Jiaqi Lu, Iddo TzameretSTOC 2026 · 5 citations
- Polynomial Identity Testing and the Ideal Proof System: PIT Is in NP If and Only If IPS Can Be p-Simulated by a Cook-Reckhow Proof SystemJoshua A. GrochowSTOC 2026 · 3 citations
- Functional Lower Bounds in Algebraic Proofs: Symmetry, Lifting, and BarriersTuomas Hakoniemi, Nutan Limaye, Iddo TzameretSTOC 2024
Builds on4
- Superpolynomial Lower Bounds Against Low-Depth Algebraic CircuitsNutan Limaye, Srikanth Srinivasan, Sébastien TavenasFOCS 2021 · 26 citations
- Semi-algebraic proofs, IPS lower bounds, and the τ-conjecture: can a natural number be negative?Yaroslav Alekseev, Dima Grigoriev, Edward A. Hirsch, Iddo TzameretSTOC 2020 · 9 citations
- The Surprising Power of Constant Depth Algebraic ProofsRussell Impagliazzo, Sasank Mouli, Toniann PitassiLICS 2020 · 9 citations
- Ideals, determinants, and straightening: proving and using lower bounds for polynomial idealsRobert Andrews, Michael A. ForbesSTOC 2022 · 6 citations
Related papers
- Set-multilinear and non-commutative formula lower bounds for iterated matrix multiplicationSébastien Tavenas, Nutan Limaye, Srikanth SrinivasanSTOC 2022 · 4 citations
- Iterated lower bound formulas: a diagonalization-based approach to proof complexityRahul Santhanam, Iddo TzameretSTOC 2021 · 4 citations
- Closure under Factorization from a Result of FurstenbergSomnath Bhattacharjee, Mrinal Kumar, Shanthanu S. Rai, Varun Ramanathan et al.STOC 2026 · 9 citations
- Constant Depth Formula and Partial Function Versions of MCSP are HardRahul IlangoFOCS 2020 · 10 citations
- Meta-Mathematics of Algebraic ComplexityMichal Garlík, Svyatoslav Gryaznov, Jiaqi Lu, Rahul Santhanam et al.LICS 2026
