Ideals, determinants, and straightening: proving and using lower bounds for polynomial ideals
Robert Andrews, Michael A. Forbes
Abstract
We show that any nonzero polynomial in the ideal generated by the r × r minors of an n × n matrix X can be used to efficiently approximate the determinant. Specifically, for any nonzero polynomial f in this ideal, we construct a small depth-three f -oracle circuit that approximates the Θ(r 1/3 ) × Θ(r 1/3 ) determinant in the sense of border complexity. For many classes of algebraic circuits, this implies that every nonzero polynomial in the ideal generated by r × r minors is at least as hard to approximately compute as the Θ(r 1/3 ) × Θ(r 1/3 ) determinant. We also prove an analogous result for the Pfaffian of a 2n × 2n skew-symmetric matrix and the ideal generated by Pfaffians of 2r × 2r principal submatrices. This answers a recent question of Grochow [Gro20, Conjecture 6.3] about complexity in polynomial ideals in the setting of border complexity. Leveraging connections between the complexity of polynomial ideals and other questions in algebraic complexity, our results provide a generic recipe that allows lower bounds for the determinant to be applied to other problems in algebraic complexity. We give several such applications, two of which are highlighted below.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext aa554337-41d9-4b28-9e4d-015a92dc9153Cited by top-tier papers12
- Superpolynomial Lower Bounds Against Low-Depth Algebraic CircuitsNutan Limaye, Srikanth Srinivasan, Sébastien TavenasFOCS 2021 · 26 citations
- Closure under Factorization from a Result of FurstenbergSomnath Bhattacharjee, Mrinal Kumar, Shanthanu S. Rai, Varun Ramanathan et al.STOC 2026 · 9 citations
- Lower Bounds against the Ideal Proof System in Finite FieldsTal Elbaz, Nashlen Govindasamy, Jiaqi Lu, Iddo TzameretSTOC 2026 · 5 citations
- On the Existence of Algebraically Natural ProofsPrerona Chatterjee, Mrinal Kumar, C. Ramya, Ramprasad Saptharishi et al.FOCS 2020 · 5 citations
- Deterministic factorization of constant-depth algebraic circuits in subexponential timeSomnath Bhattacharjee, Mrinal Kumar, Varun Ramanathan, Ramprasad Saptharishi et al.FOCS 2025 · 4 citations
Builds on6
- Superpolynomial Lower Bounds Against Low-Depth Algebraic CircuitsNutan Limaye, Srikanth Srinivasan, Sébastien TavenasFOCS 2021 · 26 citations
- Semi-algebraic proofs, IPS lower bounds, and the τ-conjecture: can a natural number be negative?Yaroslav Alekseev, Dima Grigoriev, Edward A. Hirsch, Iddo TzameretSTOC 2020 · 9 citations
- Polynomial time deterministic identity testing algorithm for Σ[3]ΠΣΠ[2] circuits via Edelstein-Kelly type theorem for quadratic polynomialsShir Peleg, Amir ShpilkaSTOC 2021 · 9 citations
- The Surprising Power of Constant Depth Algebraic ProofsRussell Impagliazzo, Sasank Mouli, Toniann PitassiLICS 2020 · 9 citations
- Demystifying the border of depth-3 algebraic circuitsPranjal Dutta, Prateek Dwivedi, Nitin SaxenaFOCS 2021 · 6 citations
Related papers
- On Matrix Multiplication and Polynomial Identity TestingRobert AndrewsFOCS 2022 · 1 citation
- Learning Read-Once Determinants and the Principal Minor Assignment ProblemAbhiram Aravind, Abhranil Chatterjee, Sumanta Ghosh, Rohit Gurjar et al.STOC 2026
- The Communication Complexity of Approximating Matrix RankAlexander A. Sherstov, Andrey A. StorozhenkoFOCS 2024 · 1 citation
- Excluding Single-Crossing Matching Minors in Bipartite GraphsArchontia C. Giannopoulou, Dimitrios M. Thilikos, Sebastian WiederrechtSODA 2023 · 3 citations
- Characterizing and Testing Principal Minor Equivalence of MatricesAbhranil Chatterjee, Sumanta Ghosh, Rohit Gurjar, Roshan RajSTOC 2025
