Solving Common-Payoff Games with Approximate Policy Iteration
Samuel Sokota, Edward Lockhart, Finbarr Timbers, Elnaz Davoodi, Ryan D'Orazio, Neil Burch, Martin Schmid, Michael Bowling, Marc Lanctot
Abstract
For artificially intelligent learning systems to have widespread applicability in real-world settings, it is important that they be able to operate decentrally. Unfortunately, decentralized control is difficult---computing even an epsilon-optimal joint policy is a NEXP complete problem. Nevertheless, a recently rediscovered insight---that a team of agents can coordinate via common knowledge---has given rise to algorithms capable of finding optimal joint policies in small common-payoff games. The Bayesian action decoder (BAD) leverages this insight and deep reinforcement learning to scale to games as large as two-player Hanabi. However, the approximations it uses to do so prevent it from discovering optimal joint policies even in games small enough to brute force optimal solutions. This work proposes CAPI, a novel algorithm which, like BAD, combines common knowledge with deep reinforcement learning. However, unlike BAD, CAPI prioritizes the propensity to discover optimal joint policies over scalability. While this choice precludes CAPI from scaling to games as large as Hanabi, empirical results demonstrate that, on the games to which CAPI does scale, it is capable of discovering optimal joint policies even when other modern multi-agent reinforcement learning algorithms are unable to do so.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers8
- Multi-Agent Training beyond Zero-Sum with Correlated Equilibrium Meta-SolversLuke Marris, Paul Muller, Marc Lanctot, Karl Tuyls et al.ICML 2021 · 42 citations
- A Marriage between Adversarial Team Games and 2-player Games: Enabling Abstractions, No-regret Learning, and Subgame SolvingLuca Carminati, Federico Cacciamani, Marco Ciccone, Nicola GattiICML 2022 · 18 citations
- Team Belief DAG: Generalizing the Sequence Form to Team Games for Fast Computation of Correlated Team Max-Min Equilibria via Regret MinimizationBrian Hu Zhang, Gabriele Farina, Tuomas SandholmICML 2023 · 16 citations
- A Fine-Tuning Approach to Belief State ModelingSamuel Sokota, Hengyuan Hu, David J. Wu, J. Zico Kolter et al.ICLR 2022 · 13 citations
- Abstracting Imperfect Information Away from Two-Player Zero-Sum GamesSamuel Sokota, Ryan D'Orazio, Chun Kai Ling, David J. Wu et al.ICML 2023 · 8 citations
Builds on4
- Improving Policies via Search in Cooperative Partially Observable GamesAdam Lerer, Hengyuan Hu, Jakob N. Foerster, Noam BrownAAAI 2020 · 87 citations
- Human-Level Performance in No-Press Diplomacy via Equilibrium SearchJonathan Gray, Adam Lerer, Anton Bakhtin, Noam BrownICLR 2021 · 61 citations
- Learning to Play No-Press Diplomacy with Best Response Policy IterationThomas W. Anthony, Tom Eccles, Andrea Tacchetti, János Kramár et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 50 citations
- Optimally Solving Two-Agent Decentralized POMDPs Under One-Sided Information SharingYuxuan Xie, Jilles Dibangoye, Olivier BuffetICML 2020 · 15 citations
Related papers
- Simplified Action Decoder for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningHengyuan Hu, Jakob N. FoersterICLR 2020 · 88 citations
- Off-Belief LearningHengyuan Hu, Adam Lerer, Brandon Cui, Luis Pineda et al.ICML 2021 · 86 citations
- Context-Aware Bayesian Network Actor-Critic Methods for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningDingyang Chen, Qi ZhangICML 2023 · 5 citations
- A Logical Analysis of HanabiElise PerrotinAAAI 2025 · 1 citation
- Scalable Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Networked Systems with Average RewardGuannan Qu, Yiheng Lin, Adam Wierman, Na LiNeurIPS 2020 · 99 citations
