ILDC for CJPE: Indian Legal Documents Corpus for Court Judgment Prediction and Explanation
Vijit Malik, Rishabh Sanjay, Shubham Kumar Nigam, Kripabandhu Ghosh, Shouvik Kumar Guha, Arnab Bhattacharya, Ashutosh Modi
Abstract
An automated system that could assist a judge in predicting the outcome of a case would help expedite the judicial process. For such a system to be practically useful, predictions by the system should be explainable. To promote research in developing such a system, we introduce ILDC (Indian Legal Documents Corpus). ILDC is a large corpus of 35k Indian Supreme Court cases annotated with original court decisions. A portion of the corpus (a separate test set) is annotated with gold standard explanations by legal experts. Based on ILDC, we propose the task of Court Judgment Prediction and Explanation (CJPE). The task requires an automated system to predict an explainable outcome of a case. We experiment with a battery of baseline models for case predictions and propose a hierarchical occlusion based model for explainability. Our best prediction model has an accuracy of 78% versus 94% for human legal experts, pointing towards the complexity of the prediction task. The analysis of explanations by the proposed algorithm reveals a significant difference in the point of view of the algorithm and legal experts for explaining the judgments, pointing towards scope for future research.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4ca9455b-e538-412e-a814-cc84f4d61ebfCited by top-tier papers11
- Precedent-Enhanced Legal Judgment Prediction with LLM and Domain-Model CollaborationYiquan Wu, Siying Zhou, Yifei Liu, Weiming Lu et al.EMNLP 2023 · 37 citations
- DKPLM: Decomposable Knowledge-Enhanced Pre-trained Language Model for Natural Language UnderstandingTaolin Zhang, Chengyu Wang, Nan Hu, Minghui Qiu et al.AAAI 2022 · 36 citations
- LeXFiles and LegalLAMA: Facilitating English Multinational Legal Language Model DevelopmentIlias Chalkidis, Nicolas Garneau, Catalina Goanta, Daniel Martin Katz et al.ACL 2023 · 29 citations
- U-CREAT: Unsupervised Case Retrieval using Events extrAcTionAbhinav Joshi, Akshat Sharma, Sai Kiran Tanikella, Ashutosh ModiACL 2023 · 7 citations
- From Dissonance to Insights: Dissecting Disagreements in Rationale Construction for Case Outcome ClassificationShanshan Xu, T. Y. S. S. Santosh, Oana Ichim, Isabella Risini et al.EMNLP 2023 · 1 citation
Builds on3
- Reformer: The Efficient TransformerNikita Kitaev, Lukasz Kaiser, Anselm LevskayaICLR 2020 · 2,878 citations
- Distinguish Confusing Law Articles for Legal Judgment PredictionNuo Xu, Pinghui Wang, Long Chen, Li Pan et al.ACL 2020 · 150 citations
- Iteratively Questioning and Answering for Interpretable Legal Judgment PredictionHaoxi Zhong, Yuzhong Wang, Cunchao Tu, Tianyang Zhang et al.AAAI 2020 · 133 citations
Related papers
- IL-TUR: Benchmark for Indian Legal Text Understanding and ReasoningAbhinav Joshi, Shounak Paul, Akshat Sharma, Pawan Goyal et al.ACL 2024 · 11 citations
- IL-PCSR: Legal Corpus for Prior Case and Statute RetrievalShounak Paul, Dhananjay Ghumare, Pawan Goyal, Saptarshi Ghosh et al.EMNLP 2025
- LeSICiN: A Heterogeneous Graph-Based Approach for Automatic Legal Statute Identification from Indian Legal DocumentsShounak Paul, Pawan Goyal, Saptarshi GhoshAAAI 2022 · 61 citations
- LePaRD: A Large-Scale Dataset of Judicial Citations to PrecedentRobert Mahari, Dominik Stammbach, Elliott Ash, Alex PentlandACL 2024 · 1 citation
- LegalReasoner: Step-wised Verification-Correction for Legal Judgment ReasoningWeijie Shi, Han Zhu, Jiaming Ji, Mengze Li et al.ACL 2025 · 10 citations
