MetaOOD: Automatic Selection of OOD Detection Models
Yuehan Qin, Yichi Zhang, Yi Nian, Xueying Ding, Yue Zhao
Abstract
How can we automatically select an out-of-distribution (OOD) detection model for various underlying tasks? This is crucial for maintaining the reliability of open-world applications by identifying data distribution shifts, particularly in critical domains such as online transactions, autonomous driving, and real-time patient diagnosis. Despite the availability of numerous OOD detection methods, the challenge of selecting an optimal model for diverse tasks remains largely underexplored, especially in scenarios lacking ground truth labels. In this work, we introduce MetaOOD, the first zero-shot, unsupervised framework that utilizes metalearning to select an OOD detection model automatically. As a meta-learning approach, MetaOOD leverages historical performance data of existing methods across various benchmark OOD detection datasets, enabling the effective selection of a suitable model for new datasets without the need for labeled data at the test time. To quantify task similarities more accurately, we introduce language model-based embeddings that capture the distinctive OOD characteristics of both datasets and detection models. Through extensive experimentation with 24 unique test dataset pairs to choose from among 11 OOD detection models, we demonstrate that MetaOOD significantly outperforms existing methods and only brings marginal time overhead. Our results, validated by Wilcoxon statistical tests, show that MetaOOD surpasses a diverse group of 11 baselines, including established OOD detectors and advanced unsupervised selection methods.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4c7a661d-e73b-44ca-8761-7f61e414e18fCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on16
- Energy-based Out-of-distribution DetectionWeitang Liu, Xiaoyun Wang, John D. Owens, Yixuan LiNeurIPS 2020 · 2,213 citations
- Scaling Out-of-Distribution Detection for Real-World SettingsDan Hendrycks, Steven Basart, Mantas Mazeika, Andy Zou et al.ICML 2022 · 653 citations
- Open-Set Recognition: A Good Closed-Set Classifier is All You NeedSagar Vaze, Kai Han, Andrea Vedaldi, Andrew ZissermanICLR 2022 · 594 citations
- ViM: Out-Of-Distribution with Virtual-logit MatchingHaoqi Wang, Zhizhong Li, Litong Feng, Wayne ZhangCVPR 2022 · 227 citations
- Can Autonomous Vehicles Identify, Recover From, and Adapt to Distribution Shifts?Angelos Filos, Panagiotis Tigas, Rowan McAllister, Nicholas Rhinehart et al.ICML 2020 · 225 citations
Related papers
- Automatic Unsupervised Outlier Model SelectionYue Zhao, Ryan A. Rossi, Leman AkogluNeurIPS 2021 · 104 citations
- Meta OOD Learning For Continuously Adaptive OOD DetectionXinheng Wu, Jie Lu, Zhen Fang, Guangquan ZhangICCV 2023 · 15 citations
- OOD-MAML: Meta-Learning for Few-Shot Out-of-Distribution Detection and ClassificationTaewon Jeong, Heeyoung KimNeurIPS 2020 · 111 citations
- Secure Out-of-Distribution Task Generalization with Energy-Based ModelsShengzhuang Chen, Long-Kai Huang, Jonathan Richard Schwarz, Yilun Du et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10 citations
- Two Sides of Meta-Learning Evaluation: In vs. Out of DistributionAmrith Setlur, Oscar Li, Virginia SmithNeurIPS 2021 · 17 citations
