A Certified Unlearning Approach without Access to Source Data
Umit Yigit Basaran, Sk Miraj Ahmed, Amit Roy-Chowdhury, Basak Guler
Abstract
With the growing adoption of data privacy regulations, the ability to erase private or copyrighted information from trained models has become a crucial requirement. Traditional unlearning methods often assume access to the complete training dataset, which is unrealistic in scenarios where the source data is no longer available. To address this challenge, we propose a certified unlearning framework that enables effective data removal without access to the original training data samples. Our approach utilizes a surrogate dataset that approximates the statistical properties of the source data, allowing for controlled noise scaling based on the statistical distance between the two. While our theoretical guarantees assume knowledge of the exact statistical distance, practical implementations typically approximate this distance, resulting in potentially weaker but still meaningful privacy guarantees. This ensures strong guarantees on the model's behavior post-unlearning while maintaining its overall utility. We establish theoretical bounds, introduce practical noise calibration techniques, and validate our method through extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets. The results demonstrate the effectiveness and reliability of our approach in privacy-sensitive settings.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4c489f25-d032-4393-9ae0-110ed2ad7fb0Cited by top-tier papers3
- The Forgetting-Retention Dilemma: Certified Unlearning Theory in Continual LearningYiting Hu, Lingjie Duan, Qian ZhangICML 2026
- Less is More: Geometric Unlearning for LLMs with Minimal Data DisclosureChenchen Tan, Xinghao Li, Shujie Cui, Youyang Qu et al.ICML 2026
- Enhancing Trustworthiness of Fine-Tuned LLMs via Regularized Subset SelectionKumar Shubham, Nishant Sharma, Karn Tiwari, Prathosh APICLR 2026
Builds on14
- Machine UnlearningLucas Bourtoule, Varun Chandrasekaran, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Hengrui Jia et al.S&P 2021 · 1,381 citations
- Your classifier is secretly an energy based model and you should treat it like oneWill Grathwohl, Kuan-Chieh Wang, Jörn-Henrik Jacobsen, David Duvenaud et al.ICLR 2020 · 643 citations
- Certified Data Removal from Machine Learning ModelsChuan Guo, Tom Goldstein, Awni Y. Hannun, Laurens van der MaatenICML 2020 · 633 citations
- Remember What You Want to Forget: Algorithms for Machine UnlearningAyush Sekhari, Jayadev Acharya, Gautam Kamath, Ananda Theertha SureshNeurIPS 2021 · 516 citations
- Towards Unbounded Machine UnlearningMeghdad Kurmanji, Peter Triantafillou, Jamie Hayes, Eleni TriantafillouNeurIPS 2023 · 363 citations
Related papers
- Towards Source-Free Machine UnlearningSk Miraj Ahmed, Umit Yigit Basaran, Dripta S. Raychaudhuri, Arindam Dutta et al.CVPR 2025
- Certified Unlearning for Neural NetworksAnastasia Koloskova, Youssef Allouah, Animesh Jha, Rachid Guerraoui et al.ICML 2025
- Machine Unlearning of Features and LabelsAlexander Warnecke, Lukas Pirch, Christian Wressnegger, Konrad RieckNDSS 2023
- Hard to Forget: Poisoning Attacks on Certified Machine UnlearningNeil G. Marchant, Benjamin I. P. Rubinstein, Scott AlfeldAAAI 2022 · 95 citations
- The Utility and Complexity of In- and Out-of-Distribution Machine UnlearningYoussef Allouah, Joshua Kazdan, Rachid Guerraoui, Sanmi KoyejoICLR 2025
