GPS: Graph-guided Proactive Information Seeking in Large Language Models
Ruiqing Li, Yifeng Xu, Xinke Jiang, Zhibang Yang, Xinyu Ma, Yue Fang, Junfeng Zhao, Yasha Wang, Xu Chu
Abstract
Equipping Large Language Models (LLMs) with the ability to proactively ask clarifying questions is essential to mitigate ambiguity when faced with underspecified user queries in retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems. However, existing methods often neglect the rule-based reasoning structures embedded in the retrieved knowledge that are central to ambiguity, making it challenging to learn an effective and efficient question-asking strategy. To address these issues, we introduce GPS, a two-stage framework for enhancing proactive information seeking abilities of LLMs in RAG systems. In the reasoning stage, we propose a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) reasoning structure with theoretical guarantees of logical completeness, which facilitates capturing all conditional logic in the retrieved knowledge and supports effective clarification. In the clarification stage, we design a traversal-based algorithm that dynamically prunes the DAG based on user responses, enabling efficient clarification. To further enhance DAG construction, we first propose a conditional paths guided data synthesis method to address data scarcity challenge, then we apply a clarification-oriented reinforcement learning method with a hybrid reward that jointly considers effectiveness and efficiency to optimize the LLM. Experiments on three benchmarks demonstrate that GPS outperforms baseline methods in both success rate and clarification efficiency. 1 * Corresponding Author 1 Our code is open-sourced at https://github.com/lrq111/GPS.git .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on16
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language ModelsMaciej Besta, Nils Blach, Ales Kubicek, Robert Gerstenberger et al.AAAI 2024 · 1,292 citations
- Query2box: Reasoning over Knowledge Graphs in Vector Space Using Box EmbeddingsHongyu Ren, Weihua Hu, Jure LeskovecICLR 2020 · 355 citations
- MedRAG: Enhancing Retrieval-augmented Generation with Knowledge Graph-Elicited Reasoning for Healthcare CopilotXuejiao Zhao, Siyan Liu, Su-Yin Yang, Chunyan MiaoWWW 2025 · 134 citations
- Uncertainty of Thoughts: Uncertainty-Aware Planning Enhances Information Seeking in LLMsZhiyuan Hu, Chumin Liu, Xidong Feng, Yilun Zhao et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 43 citations
Related papers
- GraphRAG-R1: Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Process-Constrained Reinforcement LearningChuanyue Yu, Kuo Zhao, Yuhan Li, Heng Chang et al.WWW 2026 · 8 citations
- You Don't Need Pre-Built Graphs for RAG: Retrieval Augmented Generation with Adaptive Reasoning StructuresShengyuan Chen, Chuang Zhou, Zheng Yuan, Qinggang Zhang et al.AAAI 2026 · 14 citations
- LeTS: Learning to Think-and-Search via Process-and-Outcome Reward HybridizationQi Zhang, Shouqing Yang, Lirong Gao, Hao Chen et al.EMNLP 2025
- RAS: Retrieval-And-Structuring for Knowledge-Intensive LLM GenerationPengcheng Jiang, Lang Cao, Ruike Zhu, Minhao Jiang et al.ICLR 2026 · 20 citations
- Process vs. Outcome Reward: Which is Better for Agentic RAG Reinforcement LearningWenlin Zhang, Xiangyang Li, Kuicai Dong, Yichao Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 85 citations
