Sequential Multi-Agent Dynamic Algorithm Configuration
Chen Lu, Ke Xue, Lei Yuan, Yao Wang, Yaoyuan Wang, Sheng Fu, Chao Qian
Abstract
The performance of an algorithm often critically depends on its hyperparameter configuration. Dynamic algorithm configuration (DAC) is a recent trend in automated machine learning, which can dynamically adjust the algorithm's configuration during the execution process and relieve users from tedious trial-and-error tuning tasks. Recently, multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) approaches have improved the configuration of multiple heterogeneous hyperparameters, making various parameter configurations for complex algorithms possible. However, many complex algorithms have inherent inter-dependencies among multiple parameters (e.g., determining the operator type first and then the operator's parameter), which are, however, not considered in previous approaches, thus leading to sub-optimal results. In this paper, we propose the sequential multi-agent DAC (Seq-MADAC) framework to address this issue by considering the inherent inter-dependencies of multiple parameters. Specifically, we propose a sequential advantage decomposition network, which can leverage action-order information through sequential advantage decomposition. Experiments from synthetic functions to the configuration of multi-objective optimization algorithms demonstrate Seq-MADAC's superior performance over state-of-the-art MARL methods and show strong generalization across problem classes. Seq-MADAC establishes a new paradigm for the widespread dependency-aware automated algorithm configuration. Our code is available at https://github.com/lamda-bbo/seq-madac.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4c1affb8-5e87-41ee-b453-33f9daca3663Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on9
- Trust Region Policy Optimisation in Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningJakub Grudzien Kuba, Ruiqing Chen, Muning Wen, Ying Wen et al.ICLR 2022 · 367 citations
- Multi-agent Dynamic Algorithm ConfigurationKe Xue, Jiacheng Xu, Lei Yuan, Miqing Li et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 65 citations
- Revisiting Some Common Practices in Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningWei Fu, Chao Yu, Zelai Xu, Jiaqi Yang et al.ICML 2022 · 49 citations
- ACE: Cooperative Multi-Agent Q-learning with Bidirectional Action-DependencyChuming Li, Jie Liu, Yinmin Zhang, Yuhong Wei et al.AAAI 2023 · 38 citations
- Maximum Entropy Heterogeneous-Agent Reinforcement LearningJiarong Liu, Yifan Zhong, Siyi Hu, Haobo Fu et al.ICLR 2024 · 27 citations
Related papers
- Graph-Supported Dynamic Algorithm Configuration for Multi-Objective Combinatorial OptimizationRobbert Reijnen, Yaoxin Wu, Zaharah Bukhsh, Yingqian ZhangICML 2025
- Meta-Black-Box-Optimization through Offline Q-function LearningZeyuan Ma, Zhiguang Cao, Zhou Jiang, Hongshu Guo et al.ICML 2025
- Context-Aware Bayesian Network Actor-Critic Methods for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningDingyang Chen, Qi ZhangICML 2023 · 5 citations
- Scaling Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Selective Parameter SharingFilippos Christianos, Georgios Papoudakis, Arrasy Rahman, Stefano V. AlbrechtICML 2021 · 165 citations
- Measuring Mutual Policy Divergence for Multi-Agent Sequential ExplorationHaowen Dou, Lujuan Dang, Zhirong Luan, Badong ChenNeurIPS 2024 · 7 citations
