Multi-agent Dynamic Algorithm Configuration
Ke Xue, Jiacheng Xu, Lei Yuan, Miqing Li, Chao Qian, Zongzhang Zhang, Yang Yu
Abstract
Automated algorithm configuration relieves users from tedious, trial-and-error tuning tasks. A popular algorithm configuration tuning paradigm is dynamic algorithm configuration (DAC), in which an agent learns dynamic configuration policies across instances by reinforcement learning (RL). However, in many complex algorithms, there may exist different types of configuration hyperparameters, and such heterogeneity may bring difficulties for classic DAC which uses a single-agent RL policy. In this paper, we aim to address this issue and propose multi-agent DAC (MA-DAC), with one agent working for one type of configuration hyperparameter. MA-DAC formulates the dynamic configuration of a complex algorithm with multiple types of hyperparameters as a contextual multi-agent Markov decision process and solves it by a cooperative multi-agent RL (MARL) algorithm. To instantiate, we apply MA-DAC to a well-known optimization algorithm for multi-objective optimization problems. Experimental results show the effectiveness of MA-DAC in not only achieving superior performance compared with other configuration tuning approaches based on heuristic rules, multi-armed bandits, and single-agent RL, but also being capable of generalizing to different problem classes. Furthermore, we release the environments in this paper as a benchmark for testing MARL algorithms, with the hope of facilitating the application of MARL.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2daf9c85-c6b6-47d7-8d0c-bc1ed1f5207eCited by top-tier papers15
- Robust Multi-Agent Coordination via Evolutionary Generation of Auxiliary Adversarial AttackersLei Yuan, Ziqian Zhang, Ke Xue, Hao Yin et al.AAAI 2023 · 31 citations
- Pareto Set Learning for Multi-Objective Reinforcement LearningErlong Liu, Yu-Chang Wu, Xiaobin Huang, Chengrui Gao et al.AAAI 2025 · 24 citations
- ConfigX: Modular Configuration for Evolutionary Algorithms via Multitask Reinforcement LearningHongshu Guo, Zeyuan Ma, Jiacheng Chen, Yining Ma et al.AAAI 2025 · 13 citations
- Sequential Multi-Agent Dynamic Algorithm ConfigurationChen Lu, Ke Xue, Lei Yuan, Yao Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 8 citations
- DesignX: Human-Competitive Algorithm Designer for Black-Box OptimizationHongshu Guo, Zeyuan Ma, Yining Ma, Xinglin Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
Builds on3
- PettingZoo: Gym for Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningJ. K. Terry, Benjamin Black, Nathaniel Grammel, Mario Jayakumar et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 478 citations
- Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Active Voltage Control on Power Distribution NetworksJianhong Wang, Wangkun Xu, Yunjie Gu, Wenbin Song et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 216 citations
- Fair Algorithms for Multi-Agent Multi-Armed BanditsSafwan Hossain, Evi Micha, Nisarg ShahNeurIPS 2021 · 69 citations
Related papers
- Graph-Supported Dynamic Algorithm Configuration for Multi-Objective Combinatorial OptimizationRobbert Reijnen, Yaoxin Wu, Zaharah Bukhsh, Yingqian ZhangICML 2025
- AC-Band: A Combinatorial Bandit-Based Approach to Algorithm ConfigurationJasmin Brandt, Elias Schede, Björn Haddenhorst, Viktor Bengs et al.AAAI 2023 · 7 citations
- Sample-Efficient Automated Deep Reinforcement LearningJörg K. H. Franke, Gregor Köhler, André Biedenkapp, Frank HutterICLR 2021 · 49 citations
- On Generalization Across Environments In Multi-Objective Reinforcement LearningJayden Teoh, Pradeep Varakantham, Peter VamplewICLR 2025
- Prediction-Guided Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning for Continuous Robot ControlJie Xu, Yunsheng Tian, Pingchuan Ma, Daniela Rus et al.ICML 2020 · 210 citations
