An Empirical Study of Translation Hypothesis Ensembling with Large Language Models
António Farinhas, José Guilherme Camargo de Souza, André F. T. Martins
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are becoming a one-fits-many solution, but they sometimes hallucinate or produce unreliable output. In this paper, we investigate how hypothesis ensembling can improve the quality of the generated text for the specific problem of LLM-based machine translation. We experiment with several techniques for ensembling hypotheses produced by LLMs such as ChatGPT, LLaMA, and Alpaca. We provide a comprehensive study along multiple dimensions, including the method to generate hypotheses (multiple prompts, temperaturebased sampling, and beam search) and the strategy to produce the final translation (instructionbased, quality-based reranking, and minimum Bayes risk (MBR) decoding). Our results show that MBR decoding is a very effective method, that translation quality can be improved using a small number of samples, and that instruction tuning has a strong impact on the relation between the diversity of the hypotheses and the sampling temperature. Our code is available at https://github.com/deep-spin/ translation-hypothesis-ensembling .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4b8e11c1-81da-4a9b-9ff7-04c8822df6aeCited by top-tier papers16
- QUEST: Quality-Aware Metropolis-Hastings Sampling for Machine TranslationGonçalo Rui Alves Faria, Sweta Agrawal, António Farinhas, Ricardo Rei et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 23 citations
- Cool-Fusion: Fuse Large Language Models without TrainingCong Liu, Xiaojun Quan, Yan Pan, Weigang Wu et al.ACL 2025 · 12 citations
- Model-Based Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding for Text GenerationYuu Jinnai, Tetsuro Morimura, Ukyo Honda, Kaito Ariu et al.ICML 2024 · 9 citations
- Watching the Watchers: Exposing Gender Disparities in Machine Translation Quality EstimationEmmanouil Zaranis, Giuseppe Attanasio, Sweta Agrawal, André F. T. MartinsACL 2025 · 8 citations
- CoT-based Synthesizer: Enhancing LLM Performance through Answer SynthesisBohan Zhang, Xiaokang Zhang, Jing Zhang, Jifan Yu et al.ACL 2025 · 8 citations
Builds on14
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-FeedbackAman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,972 citations
- The Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationAri Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes et al.ICLR 2020 · 4,112 citations
- Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team PerformanceGagan Bansal, Tongshuang Wu, Joyce Zhou, Raymond Fok et al.CHI 2021 · 713 citations
- Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsXuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le et al.ICLR 2023 · 681 citations
Related papers
- Improving Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding with Multi-PromptDavid Heineman, Yao Dou, Wei XuEMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
- Self-Alignment with Instruction BacktranslationXian Li, Ping Yu, Chunting Zhou, Timo Schick et al.ICLR 2024 · 174 citations
- Better Instruction-Following Through Minimum Bayes RiskIan Wu, Patrick Fernandes, Amanda Bertsch, Seungone Kim et al.ICLR 2025
- Don't Rank, Combine! Combining Machine Translation Hypotheses Using Quality EstimationGiorgos Vernikos, Andrei Popescu-BelisACL 2024
- RLAE: Reinforcement Learning-Assisted Ensemble for LLMsYuqian Fu, Yuanheng Zhu, Jiajun Chai, Guojun Yin et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
