ACL Findings2026
ToolPRMBench: Evaluating and Advancing Process Reward Models for Tool-using Agents
Dawei Li, Yuguang Yao, Zhen Tan, Huan Liu, Ruocheng Guo
Abstract
Reward-guided search methods have demonstrated strong potential in enhancing tool-using agents by effectively guiding sampling and exploration over complex action spaces. As a core design, those search methods utilize process reward models (PRMs) to provide step-level rewards, enabling more fine-grained monitoring. However, there is a lack of systematic and reliable evaluation benchmarks for PRMs in tool-use settings. In this paper, we introduce ToolPRMBench, a large-scale benchmark specifically designed to evaluate PRMs for tool-using agents. ToolPRMBench is built on top of several representative tooluse benchmarks and converts agent trajectories into step-level test cases. Each case contains the interaction history, a correct action, a plausible but incorrect alternative, and relevant tool metadata. We respectively utilize offline sampling to isolate local single-step errors and online sampling to capture realistic multi-step failures from full agent rollouts. A multi-LLM verification pipeline is proposed to reduce label noise and ensure data quality. We conduct extensive experiments across large language models, general PRMs, and tool-specialized PRMs on ToolPRMBench. The results reveal clear differences in PRM effectiveness and highlight the potential of specialized PRMs for tool-using. Our code and dataset are available at: https://github. com/David-Li0406/ToolPRMBench 1 .
Ask Lune
Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.
Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.
Lune answers from
the full paper · 1 top-tier paper that cites it · related work
Free to start. No credit card required.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Builds on17
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsXuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le et al.ICLR 2023 · 681 citations
- Language Agent Tree Search Unifies Reasoning, Acting, and Planning in Language ModelsAndy Zhou, Kai Yan, Michal Shlapentokh-Rothman, Haohan Wang et al.ICML 2024 · 443 citations
- ToolRL: Reward is All Tool Learning NeedsCheng Qian, Emre Can Acikgoz, Qi He, Hongru Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 387 citations
- Easy-to-Hard Generalization: Scalable Alignment Beyond Human SupervisionZhiqing Sun, Longhui Yu, Yikang Shen, Weiyang Liu et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 125 citations
Related papers
- PRMBench: A Fine-grained and Challenging Benchmark for Process-Level Reward ModelsMingyang Song, Zhaochen Su, Xiaoye Qu, Jiawei Zhou et al.ACL 2025 · 85 citations
- MPBench: A Comprehensive Multimodal Reasoning Benchmark for Process Errors IdentificationXu Zhao Pan, Pengfei Zhou, Jiaxin Ai, Wangbo Zhao et al.ACL Findings 2025 · 1 citation
- Aligning Agents via Planning: A Benchmark for Trajectory-Level Reward ModelingJiaxuan Wang, Yulan Hu, Wenjin Yang, Zheng Pan et al.ACL 2026 · 1 citation
- Empowering LLM Tool Invocation with Tool-call Reward ModelDa Ma, Ziyue Yang, Hongshen Xu, Haotian Fang et al.ICLR 2026
- ToolRM: Towards Agentic Tool-Use Reward ModelingRenhao Li, Jianhong Tu, Yang Su, Yantao Liu et al.ACL Findings 2026
