MMLU-CF: A Contamination-free Multi-task Language Understanding Benchmark
Qihao Zhao, Yangyu Huang, Tengchao Lv, Lei Cui, Qinzheng Sun, Shaoguang Mao, Xin Zhang, Ying Xin, Qiufeng Yin, Scarlett Li, Furu Wei
Abstract
Multiple-choice question (MCQ) datasets like Massive Multitask Language Understanding (MMLU) are widely used to evaluate the commonsense, understanding, and problem-solving abilities of large language models (LLMs). However, the open-source nature of these benchmarks and the broad sources of training data for LLMs have inevitably led to benchmark contamination, resulting in unreliable evaluation results. To alleviate this issue, we propose a contamination-free and more challenging MCQ benchmark called MMLU-CF. This benchmark reassesses LLMs'understanding of world knowledge by averting both unintentional and malicious data leakage. To avoid unintentional data leakage, we source data from a broader domain and design three decontamination rules. To prevent malicious data leakage, we divide the benchmark into validation and test sets with similar difficulty and subject distributions. The test set remains closed-source to ensure reliable results, while the validation set is publicly available to promote transparency and facilitate independent verification. Our evaluation of mainstream LLMs reveals that the powerful GPT-4o achieves merely a 5-shot score of 73.4% and a 0-shot score of 71.9% on the test set, which indicates the effectiveness of our approach in creating a more rigorous and contamination-free evaluation standard. The GitHub repository is available at https://github.com/microsoft/MMLU-CF and the dataset refers to https://huggingface.co/datasets/microsoft/MMLU-CF.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4a89f7dc-0bde-4b6b-86e6-17d579b00688Cited by top-tier papers7
- AgentBreeder: Mitigating the AI Safety Risks of Multi-Agent Scaffolds via Self-ImprovementJ. Rosser, Jakob N. FoersterNeurIPS 2025 · 12 citations
- ICL-Router: In-Context Learned Model Representations for LLM RoutingChenxu Wang, Hao Li, Yiqun Zhang, Linyao Chen et al.AAAI 2026 · 11 citations
- Can Dependencies Induced by LLM-Agent Workflows Be Trusted?Yu Yao, Yiliao Song, Yian Xie, Mengdan Fan et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
- Benchmarking Large Language Models Under Data Contamination: A Survey from Static to Dynamic EvaluationSimin Chen, Yiming Chen, Zexin Li, Yifan Jiang et al.EMNLP 2025 · 2 citations
- ORPP: Self-Optimizing Role-playing Prompts to Enhance Language Model CapabilitiesYifan Duan, Yihong Tang, Kehai Chen, Liqiang Nie et al.EMNLP 2025
Builds on10
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human PreferenceWei-Lin Chiang, Lianmin Zheng, Ying Sheng, Anastasios Nikolas Angelopoulos et al.ICML 2024 · 1,212 citations
- Detecting Pretraining Data from Large Language ModelsWeijia Shi, Anirudh Ajith, Mengzhou Xia, Yangsibo Huang et al.ICLR 2024 · 365 citations
- Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Daphne Ippolito, Matthew Jagielski, Katherine Lee et al.ICLR 2023 · 158 citations
Related papers
- Does Question Really Matter? The Attribution of Answer Bias in LLM EvaluationBoxi Cao, Ruotong Pan, Hongyu Lin, Xianpei Han et al.AAAI 2026
- LiveBench: A Challenging, Contamination-Limited LLM BenchmarkColin White, Samuel Dooley, Manley Roberts, Arka Pal et al.ICLR 2025
- To the Cutoff... and Beyond? A Longitudinal Perspective on LLM Data ContaminationManley Roberts, Himanshu Thakur, Christine Herlihy, Colin White et al.ICLR 2024 · 45 citations
- AntiLeakBench: Preventing Data Contamination by Automatically Constructing Benchmarks with Updated Real-World KnowledgeXiaobao Wu, Liangming Pan, Yuxi Xie, Ruiwen Zhou et al.ACL 2025 · 35 citations
- Training on the Benchmark Is Not All You NeedShiwen Ni, Xiangtao Kong, Chengming Li, Xiping Hu et al.AAAI 2025 · 24 citations
