Beyond NTK with Vanilla Gradient Descent: A Mean-Field Analysis of Neural Networks with Polynomial Width, Samples, and Time
Arvind V. Mahankali, Haochen Zhang, Kefan Dong, Margalit Glasgow, Tengyu Ma
Abstract
Despite recent theoretical progress on the non-convex optimization of two-layer neural networks, it is still an open question whether gradient descent on neural networks without unnatural modifications can achieve better sample complexity than kernel methods. This paper provides a clean mean-field analysis of projected gradient flow on polynomial-width two-layer neural networks. Different from prior works, our analysis does not require unnatural modifications of the optimization algorithm. We prove that with sample size n = O(d 3.1 ) where d is the dimension of the inputs, the network trained with projected gradient flow converges in poly(d) time to a non-trivial error that is not achievable by kernel methods using n ≪ d 4 samples, hence demonstrating a clear separation between unmodified gradient descent and NTK. As a corollary, we show that projected gradient descent with a positive learning rate and a polynomial number of iterations converges to low error with the same sample complexity. * Equal Contribution Main Results We will formally define the data distribution, neural networks, projected gradient flow, and assumptions on the problem-dependent quantities and then state our main theorems.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4a40b583-27a8-4894-a68e-cb6277f3a2eeCited by top-tier papers13
- SGD Finds then Tunes Features in Two-Layer Neural Networks with near-Optimal Sample Complexity: A Case Study in the XOR problemMargalit GlasgowICLR 2024 · 27 citations
- Learning quadratic neural networks in high dimensions: SGD dynamics and scaling lawsGérard Ben Arous, Murat A. Erdogdu, Nuri Mert Vural, Denny WuNeurIPS 2025 · 23 citations
- Mean-field Analysis on Two-layer Neural Networks from a Kernel PerspectiveShokichi Takakura, Taiji SuzukiICML 2024 · 12 citations
- How does Gradient Descent Learn Features - A Local Analysis for Regularized Two-Layer Neural NetworksMo Zhou, Rong GeNeurIPS 2024 · 5 citations
- Symmetric Single Index LearningAaron Zweig, Joan BrunaICLR 2024 · 4 citations
Builds on9
- Hidden Progress in Deep Learning: SGD Learns Parities Near the Computational LimitBoaz Barak, Benjamin L. Edelman, Surbhi Goel, Sham M. Kakade et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 220 citations
- When Do Neural Networks Outperform Kernel Methods?Behrooz Ghorbani, Song Mei, Theodor Misiakiewicz, Andrea MontanariNeurIPS 2020 · 217 citations
- Learning single-index models with shallow neural networksAlberto Bietti, Joan Bruna, Clayton Sanford, Min Jae SongNeurIPS 2022 · 119 citations
- Learning Parities with Neural NetworksAmit Daniely, Eran MalachNeurIPS 2020 · 104 citations
- The staircase property: How hierarchical structure can guide deep learningEmmanuel Abbe, Enric Boix-Adserà, Matthew S. Brennan, Guy Bresler et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 74 citations
Related papers
- Polylogarithmic width suffices for gradient descent to achieve arbitrarily small test error with shallow ReLU networksZiwei Ji, Matus TelgarskyICLR 2020 · 193 citations
- On feature learning in neural networks with global convergence guaranteesZhengdao Chen, Eric Vanden-Eijnden, Joan BrunaICLR 2022 · 15 citations
- When Expressivity Meets Trainability: Fewer than Neurons Can WorkJiawei Zhang, Yushun Zhang, Mingyi Hong, Ruoyu Sun et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 11 citations
- Feature selection and low test error in shallow low-rotation ReLU networksMatus TelgarskyICLR 2023
- Learning Hierarchical Polynomials with Three-Layer Neural NetworksZihao Wang, Eshaan Nichani, Jason D. LeeICLR 2024 · 7 citations
