Learning Parities with Neural Networks
Amit Daniely, Eran Malach
Abstract
In recent years we see a rapidly growing line of research which shows learnability of various models via common neural network algorithms. Yet, besides a very few outliers, these results show learnability of models that can be learned using linear methods. Namely, such results show that learning neural-networks with gradientdescent is competitive with learning a linear classifier on top of a data-independent representation of the examples. This leaves much to be desired, as neural networks are far more successful than linear methods. Furthermore, on the more conceptual level, linear models don't seem to capture the "deepness" of deep networks. In this paper we make a step towards showing leanability of models that are inherently non-linear. We show that under certain distributions, sparse parities are learnable via gradient decent on depth-two network. On the other hand, under the same distributions, these parities cannot be learned efficiently by linear methods. How far can neural network theory go beyond linear models? In this work we show a family of distributions on which neural-networks trained with gradient-descent achieve small error. On the other hand, approximating the same family using a linear classifier on top of an embedding of the input space in R N , requires N which grows exponentially, or otherwise requires a linear classifier with exponential norm. Specifically, we focus on a standard and notoriously difficult family of target functions: parities over small subsets of the input bits. We show that this family is learnable with neural-networks under some specific choice of distributions. This implies that neural-networks algorithms are strictly stronger than linear methods, as the same family cannot be approximated by any polynomial-size linear model. Preprint. Under review.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 51016c7f-9f3d-4e57-9cf4-801e92419109Cited by top-tier papers49
- Hidden Progress in Deep Learning: SGD Learns Parities Near the Computational LimitBoaz Barak, Benjamin L. Edelman, Surbhi Goel, Sham M. Kakade et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 220 citations
- High-dimensional Asymptotics of Feature Learning: How One Gradient Step Improves the RepresentationJimmy Ba, Murat A. Erdogdu, Taiji Suzuki, Zhichao Wang et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 173 citations
- Classifying high-dimensional Gaussian mixtures: Where kernel methods fail and neural networks succeedMaria Refinetti, Sebastian Goldt, Florent Krzakala, Lenka ZdeborováICML 2021 · 83 citations
- Generalization on the Unseen, Logic Reasoning and Degree CurriculumEmmanuel Abbe, Samy Bengio, Aryo Lotfi, Kevin RizkICML 2023 · 68 citations
- Auto-Regressive Next-Token Predictors are Universal LearnersEran MalachICML 2024 · 65 citations
Builds on2
Related papers
- Provable Advantage of Curriculum Learning on Parity Targets with Mixed InputsEmmanuel Abbe, Elisabetta Cornacchia, Aryo LotfiNeurIPS 2023 · 29 citations
- On the universality of deep learningEmmanuel Abbe, Colin SandonNeurIPS 2020 · 29 citations
- Hardness of Learning Neural Networks with Natural WeightsAmit Daniely, Gal VardiNeurIPS 2020 · 23 citations
- Learning High-Degree Parities: The Crucial Role of the InitializationEmmanuel Abbe, Elisabetta Cornacchia, Jan Hazla, Donald Kougang-YombiICLR 2025
- On the non-universality of deep learning: quantifying the cost of symmetryEmmanuel Abbe, Enric Boix-AdseràNeurIPS 2022 · 24 citations
