Stepsize anything: A unified learning rate schedule for budgeted-iteration training
Anda Tang, Yiming Dong, Yutao Zeng, Xun Zhou, Zhouchen Lin
Abstract
The expanding computational costs and limited resources underscore the critical need for budgeted-iteration training, which aims to achieve optimal learning within predetermined iteration budgets. While learning rate schedules fundamentally govern the performance of different networks and tasks, particularly in budgeted-iteration scenarios, their design remains largely heuristic, lacking theoretical foundations. In addition, the optimal learning rate schedule requires extensive trial-and-error selection, making the training process inefficient. In this work, we propose the Unified Budget-Aware (UBA) schedule, a theoretically grounded learning rate schedule that consistently outperforms commonly-used schedules among diverse architectures and tasks under different constrained training budgets. First, we bridge the gap by constructing a novel training budget-aware optimization framework, which explicitly accounts for the robustness to landscape curvature variations. From this framework, we derive the UBA schedule, controlled by a single hyper-parameter that provides a trade-off between flexibility and simplicity, eliminating the need for per-network numerical optimization. Moreover, we establish a theoretical connection between and the condition number, adding interpretation and justification to our approach. Besides, we prove the convergence for different values of . We offer practical guidelines for its selection via theoretical analysis and empirical results. Extensive experimental results show that UBA consistently surpasses the commonly-used schedules across diverse vision and language tasks, spanning network architectures (e.g., ResNet, OLMo) and scales, under different training-iteration budgets.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on15
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentionHugo Touvron, Matthieu Cord, Matthijs Douze, Francisco Massa et al.ICML 2021 · 8,974 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at ScaleKeisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, Yejin ChoiAAAI 2020 · 3,037 citations
- PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural LanguageYonatan Bisk, Rowan Zellers, Ronan Le Bras, Jianfeng Gao et al.AAAI 2020 · 2,916 citations
Related papers
- Budgeted Training: Rethinking Deep Neural Network Training Under Resource ConstraintsMengtian Li, Ersin Yumer, Deva RamananICLR 2020 · 58 citations
- Understanding Warmup-Stable-Decay Learning Rates: A River Valley Loss Landscape ViewKaiyue Wen, Zhiyuan Li, Jason S. Wang, David Leo Wright Hall et al.ICLR 2025
- Why Do We Need Warm-up? A Theoretical PerspectiveFoivos Alimisis, Rustem Islamov, Aurelien LucchiICML 2026 · 8 citations
- The Surprising Agreement Between Convex Optimization Theory and Learning-Rate Scheduling for Large Model TrainingFabian Schaipp, Alexander Hägele, Adrien B. Taylor, Umut Simsekli et al.ICML 2025
- FedHyper: A Universal and Robust Learning Rate Scheduler for Federated Learning with Hypergradient DescentZiyao Wang, Jianyu Wang, Ang LiICLR 2024 · 10 citations
