The Surprising Agreement Between Convex Optimization Theory and Learning-Rate Scheduling for Large Model Training
Fabian Schaipp, Alexander Hägele, Adrien B. Taylor, Umut Simsekli, Francis Bach
Abstract
We show that learning-rate schedules for large model training behave surprisingly similar to a performance bound from non-smooth convex optimization theory. We provide a bound for the constant schedule with linear cooldown; in particular, the practical benefit of cooldown is reflected in the bound due to the absence of logarithmic terms. Further, we show that this surprisingly close match between optimization theory and practice can be exploited for learning-rate tuning: we achieve noticeable improvements for training 124M and 210M Llama-type models by (i) extending the schedule for continued training with optimal learning-rate, and (ii) transferring the optimal learning-rate across schedules.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 389c6eed-86a0-48d1-8f13-0b65e0db3c14Cited by top-tier papers16
- Apertus: Democratizing Open and Compliant LLMs for Global Language EnvironmentsAlejandro Hernández-Cano, Alexander Hägele, Allen Hao Huang, Angelika Romanou et al.ACL 2026 · 51 citations
- Functional Scaling Laws in Kernel Regression: Loss Dynamics and Learning Rate SchedulesBinghui Li, Fengling Chen, Zixun Huang, Lean Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 15 citations
- Scaling with Collapse: Efficient and Predictable Training of LLM FamiliesShane Bergsma, Bin Claire Zhang, Nolan Simran Dey, Shaheer Muhammad et al.ICLR 2026 · 10 citations
- Why Do We Need Warm-up? A Theoretical PerspectiveFoivos Alimisis, Rustem Islamov, Aurelien LucchiICML 2026 · 8 citations
- On the Role of Batch Size in Stochastic Conditional Gradient MethodsRustem Islamov, Roman Machacek, Aurelien Lucchi, Antonio Silveti-Falls et al.ICML 2026 · 6 citations
Builds on10
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Scaling Vision TransformersXiaohua Zhai, Alexander Kolesnikov, Neil Houlsby, Lucas BeyerCVPR 2022 · 767 citations
- An empirical analysis of compute-optimal large language model trainingJordan Hoffmann, Sebastian Borgeaud, Arthur Mensch, Elena Buchatskaya et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 566 citations
- Scaling Laws and Compute-Optimal Training Beyond Fixed Training DurationsAlexander Hägele, Elie Bakouch, Atli Kosson, Loubna Ben Allal et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 168 citations
- Small-scale proxies for large-scale Transformer training instabilitiesMitchell Wortsman, Peter J. Liu, Lechao Xiao, Katie E. Everett et al.ICLR 2024 · 162 citations
Related papers
- A Multi-Power Law for Loss Curve Prediction Across Learning Rate SchedulesKairong Luo, Haodong Wen, Shengding Hu, Zhenbo Sun et al.ICLR 2025
- Straight to Zero: Why Linearly Decaying the Learning Rate to Zero Works Best for LLMsShane Bergsma, Nolan Simran Dey, Gurpreet Gosal, Gavia Gray et al.ICLR 2025 · 1 citation
- Scaling and Transferability of Annealing Strategies in Large Language Model TrainingSiqi Wang, Zhengyu Chen, Teng Xiao, Zheqi Lv et al.AAAI 2026 · 1 citation
- Pre-training LLM without Learning Rate Decay Enhances Supervised Fine-TuningKazuki Yano, Shun Kiyono, Sosuke Kobayashi, Sho Takase et al.ICLR 2026 · 13 citations
- Mechanic: A Learning Rate TunerAshok Cutkosky, Aaron Defazio, Harsh MehtaNeurIPS 2023 · 27 citations
