An Empathy-Based Sandbox Approach to Bridge the Privacy Gap among Attitudes, Goals, Knowledge, and Behaviors
Chaoran Chen, Weijun Li, Wenxin Song, Yanfang Ye, Yaxing Yao, Toby Jia-Jun Li
Abstract
Managing privacy to reach privacy goals is challenging, as evidenced by the privacy attitude-behavior gap. Mitigating this discrepancy requires solutions that account for both system opaqueness and users' hesitations in testing different privacy settings due to fears of unintended data exposure. We introduce an empathy-based approach that allows users to experience how privacy attributes may alter system outcomes in a risk-free sandbox environment from the perspective of artificially generated personas. To generate realistic personas, we introduce a novel pipeline that augments the outputs of large language models (e.g., GPT-4) using few-shot learning, contextualization, and chain of thoughts. Our empirical studies demonstrated the adequate quality of generated personas and highlighted the changes in privacy-related applications (e.g., online advertising) caused by different personas. Furthermore, users demonstrated cognitive and emotional empathy towards the personas when interacting with our sandbox. We offered design implications for downstream applications in improving user privacy literacy.
• Security and privacy → Human and societal aspects of security and privacy; • Human-centered computing → Human computer interaction (HCI).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 487362ff-ddb7-4ce5-9b36-1c0a1bbf0a96Cited by top-tier papers11
- Understanding the LLM-ification of CHI: Unpacking the Impact of LLMs at CHI through a Systematic Literature ReviewRock Yuren Pang, Hope Schroeder, Kynnedy Simone Smith, Solon Barocas et al.CHI 2025 · 51 citations
- How CO2STLY Is CHI? The Carbon Footprint of Generative AI in HCI Research and What We Should Do About ItNanna Inie, Jeanette Falk, Raghavendra SelvanCHI 2025 · 33 citations
- From Knowledge to Practice: Co-Designing Privacy Controls with ChildrenLanjing Liu, Yaxing YaoCHI 2025 · 10 citations
- Users' Perceptions of Online Child Abuse Detection MechanismsElmira Deldari, Parth Kirankumar Thakkar, Yaxing YaoCSCW 2024 · 6 citations
- Creating and Evaluating Personas Using Generative AI: A Scoping Review of 81 ArticlesDanial Amin, Joni Salminen, Farhan Ahmed, Sonja M. H. Tervola et al.CHI 2026 · 6 citations
Builds on10
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Evaluating Large Language Models in Generating Synthetic HCI Research Data: a Case StudyPerttu Hämäläinen, Mikke Tavast, Anton KunnariCHI 2023 · 244 citations
- Examining the Adoption and Abandonment of Security, Privacy, and Identity Theft Protection PracticesYixin Zou, Kevin A. Roundy, Acar Tamersoy, Saurabh Shintre et al.CHI 2020 · 73 citations
- Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPSu Lin Blodgett, Solon Barocas, Hal Daumé III, Hanna M. WallachACL 2020 · 68 citations
Related papers
- Why am I seeing this: Democratizing End User Auditing for Online Content RecommendationsChaoran Chen, Leyang Li, Luke Cao, Yanfang Ye et al.UIST 2025 · 4 citations
- Persona-L has Entered the Chat: Leveraging LLMs and Ability-based Framework for Personas of People with Complex NeedsLipeipei Sun, Tianzi Qin, Anran Hu, Jiale Zhang et al.CHI 2025 · 18 citations
- Multi-LLM Persona Generation for Virtual Focus Groups in Software Engineering: A Controlled, Multi-domain Study of Emotional Requirements ElicitationGuangrui Fan, Dandan Liu, Lihu Pan, Rui Zhang et al.FSE 2026
- "It's a Fair Game", or Is It? Examining How Users Navigate Disclosure Risks and Benefits When Using LLM-Based Conversational AgentsZhiping Zhang, Michelle Jia, Hao-Ping (Hank) Lee, Bingsheng Yao et al.CHI 2024 · 92 citations
- Privacy Perceptions of Custom GPTs by Users and CreatorsRongjun Ma, Caterina Maidhof, Juan Carlos Carrillo, Janne Lindqvist et al.CHI 2025 · 35 citations
