RAG-Critic: Leveraging Automated Critic-Guided Agentic Workflow for Retrieval Augmented Generation
Guanting Dong, Jiajie Jin, Xiaoxi Li, Yutao Zhu, Zhicheng Dou, Ji-Rong Wen
Abstract
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has emerged as a pivotal technology in natural language processing, owing to its efficacy in generating factual content. However, its informative inputs and complex paradigms often lead to a greater variety of errors. Consequently, achieving automated on-policy assessment and error-oriented correction remains an unresolved issue. In this paper, we propose RAG-Critic, a novel framework that leverages a critic-guided agentic workflow to improve RAG capabilities autonomously. Specifically, we initially design a data-driven error mining pipeline to establish a hierarchical RAG error system. Based on this system, we progressively align an errorcritic model using a coarse-to-fine training objective, which automatically provides finegrained error feedback. Finally, we design a critic-guided agentic RAG workflow that customizes executor-based solution flows based on the error-critic model's feedback, facilitating an error-driven self-correction process. Experimental results across seven RAG-related datasets confirm the effectiveness of RAG-Critic, while qualitative analysis offers practical insights for achieving reliable RAG systems. Our dataset and code are available at https: //github.com/RUC-NLPIR/RAG-Critic .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 47b29a94-fec9-484b-baf6-3d4b2aa0cbf3Cited by top-tier papers4
- DeepAgent: A General Reasoning Agent with Scalable ToolsetsXiaoxi Li, Wenxiang Jiao, Jiarui Jin, Guanting Dong et al.WWW 2026 · 38 citations
- CausalRAG2: Hierarchical Causal Knowledge Graph Design for RAGNengbo Wang, Tuo Liang, Vikash Singh, Chaoda Song et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Mixture-of-RAG: Integrating Text and Tables with Large Language ModelsChi Zhang, Qiyang Chen, Mengqi ZhangKDD 2026 · 1 citation
- S2G-RAG: Structured Sufficiency and Gap Judging for Iterative Retrieval-Augmented QAMinghan Li, Junjie Zou, Xinxuan Lv, Chao Zhang et al.ACL 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on18
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- FlashAttention-2: Faster Attention with Better Parallelism and Work PartitioningTri DaoICLR 2024 · 2,600 citations
- Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentionWoosuk Kwon, Zhuohan Li, Siyuan Zhuang, Ying Sheng et al.SOSP 2023 · 1,016 citations
Related papers
- Retrieval is Not Enough: Enhancing RAG through Test-Time Critique and OptimizationJiaqi Wei, Hao Zhou, Xiang Zhang, Di Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 14 citations
- Process vs. Outcome Reward: Which is Better for Agentic RAG Reinforcement LearningWenlin Zhang, Xiangyang Li, Kuicai Dong, Yichao Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 85 citations
- Knowing You Don't Know: Learning When to Continue Search in Multi-round RAG through Self-PracticingDiji Yang, Linda Zeng, Jinmeng Rao, Yi ZhangSIGIR 2025 · 13 citations
- Optimizing Retrieval for RAG via Reinforcement LearningJiawei Zhou, Lei ChenNeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- Can We Further Elicit Reasoning in LLMs? Critic-Guided Planning with Retrieval-Augmentation for Solving Challenging TasksXingxuan Li, Weiwen Xu, Ruochen Zhao, Fangkai Jiao et al.ACL 2025 · 28 citations
