TowerMind: A Tower Defence Game Learning Environment and Benchmark for LLM as Agents
Dawei Wang, Chengming Zhou, Di Zhao, Xinyuan Liu, Marci Chi Ma, Gary Ushaw, Richard Davison
Abstract
Recent breakthroughs in Large Language Models (LLMs) have positioned them as a promising paradigm for agents, with long-term planning and decision-making emerging as core general-purpose capabilities for adapting to diverse scenarios and tasks. Real-time strategy (RTS) games serve as an ideal testbed for evaluating these two capabilities, as their inherent gameplay requires both macro-level strategic planning and micro-level tactical adaptation and action execution. Existing RTS game-based environments either suffer from relatively high computational demands or lack support for textual observations, which has constrained the use of RTS games for LLM evaluation. Motivated by this, we present TowerMind, a novel environment grounded in the tower defense (TD) subgenre of RTS games. TowerMind preserves the key evaluation strengths of RTS games for assessing LLMs, while featuring low computational demands and a multimodal observation space, including pixel-based, textual, and structured gamestate representations. In addition, TowerMind supports the evaluation of model hallucination and provides a high degree of customizability. We design five benchmark levels to evaluate several widely used LLMs under different multimodal input settings. The results reveal a clear performance gap between LLMs and human experts across both capability and hallucination dimensions. The experiments further highlight key limitations in LLM behavior, such as inadequate planning validation, a lack of multifinality in decision-making, and inefficient action use. We also evaluate two classic reinforcement learning algorithms: Ape-X DQN and PPO. By offering a lightweight and multimodal design, TowerMind complements the existing RTS game-based environment landscape and introduces a new benchmark for the AI agent field. The source code is publicly available on GitHub. 1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 47348220-1536-41f5-b8b0-64f5265cd01aCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on9
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use ToolsTimo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessì, Roberta Raileanu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,989 citations
- AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as AgentsXiao Liu, Hao Yu, Hanchen Zhang, Yifan Xu et al.ICLR 2024 · 748 citations
- Self-Rewarding Language ModelsWeizhe Yuan, Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Kyunghyun Cho, Xian Li et al.ICML 2024 · 569 citations
- Large Language Models Play StarCraft II: Benchmarks and A Chain of Summarization ApproachWeiyu Ma, Qirui Mi, Yongcheng Zeng, Xue Yan et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 122 citations
Related papers
- Theory of Mind for Multi-Agent Collaboration via Large Language ModelsHuao Li, Yu Quan Chong, Simon Stepputtis, Joseph Campbell et al.EMNLP 2023 · 57 citations
- LLMArena: Assessing Capabilities of Large Language Models in Dynamic Multi-Agent EnvironmentsJunzhe Chen, Xuming Hu, Shuodi Liu, Shiyu Huang et al.ACL 2024 · 8 citations
- BALROG: Benchmarking Agentic LLM and VLM Reasoning On GamesDavide Paglieri, Bartlomiej Cupial, Samuel Coward, Ulyana Piterbarg et al.ICLR 2025
- SmartPlay : A Benchmark for LLMs as Intelligent AgentsYue Wu, Xuan Tang, Tom M. Mitchell, Yuanzhi LiICLR 2024 · 121 citations
- LLM-PySC2: Starcraft II learning environment for Large Language ModelsZongyuan Li, Yanan Ni, Runnan Qi, Chang Lu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 15 citations
