Process-Level Trajectory Evaluation for Environment Configuration in Software Engineering Agents
Jiayi Kuang, Yinghui Li, Xin Zhang, Yangning Li, di yin, Xing Sun, Ying Shen, Philip S. Yu
Abstract
Large language model-based agents show promise for software engineering, but environment configuration remains a bottleneck due to heavy manual effort and scarce large-scale, high-quality datasets. Existing benchmarks assess only end-to-end build/test success, obscuring where and why agents succeed or fail. We introduce the Environment Configuration Diagnosis Benchmark, EnConda-bench, which provides process-level trajectory assessment of fine-grained agent capabilities during environment setup-planning, perception-driven error diagnosis, feedback-driven repair, and action to execute the final environment configuration. Our task instances are automatically constructed by injecting realistic README errors and are validated in Docker for scalable, high-quality evaluation. EnConda-bench combines process-level analysis with end-to-end executability to enable capability assessments beyond aggregate success rates. Evaluations across state-of-the-art LLMs and agent frameworks show that while agents can localize errors, they struggle to translate feedback into effective corrections, limiting end-to-end performance. To our knowledge, EnConda-bench is the first framework to provide process-level internal capability assessment for environment configuration, offering actionable insights for improving software engineering agents.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 46d22166-5085-4d09-9bc4-919676569087Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on7
- SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-world Github Issues?Carlos E. Jimenez, John Yang, Alexander Wettig, Shunyu Yao et al.ICLR 2024 · 2,082 citations
- RepoBench: Benchmarking Repository-Level Code Auto-Completion SystemsTianyang Liu, Canwen Xu, Julian J. McAuleyICLR 2024 · 338 citations
- AutoCodeRover: Autonomous Program ImprovementYuntong Zhang, Haifeng Ruan, Zhiyu Fan, Abhik RoychoudhuryISSTA 2024 · 96 citations
- You Name It, I Run It: An LLM Agent to Execute Tests of Arbitrary ProjectsIslem Bouzenia, Michael PradelISSTA 2025 · 17 citations
- OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist AgentsXingyao Wang, Boxuan Li, Yufan Song, Frank F. Xu et al.ICLR 2025 · 7 citations
Related papers
- RefactorBench: Evaluating Stateful Reasoning in Language Agents Through CodeDhruv Gautam, Spandan Garg, Jinu Jang, Neel Sundaresan et al.ICLR 2025
- LLM-based Agents for Automated Bug Fixing: How Far Are We?Xiangxin Meng, Zexiong Ma, Pengfei Gao, Chao PengICSE 2026
- Repo2Run: Automated Building Executable Environment for Code Repository at ScaleRuida Hu, Chao Peng, Xinchen Wang, Junjielong Xu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 49 citations
- FeatureBench: Benchmarking Agentic Coding for Complex Feature DevelopmentQixing Zhou, Jiacheng Zhang, Haiyang Wang, Rui Hao et al.ICLR 2026 · 30 citations
- TRAJECT-Bench: A Trajectory-Aware Benchmark for Evaluating Agentic Tool UsePengfei He, Zhenwei Dai, Bing He, Hui Liu et al.ICLR 2026 · 46 citations
