You Name It, I Run It: An LLM Agent to Execute Tests of Arbitrary Projects
Islem Bouzenia, Michael Pradel
Abstract
The ability to execute the test suite of a project is essential in many scenarios, e.g., to assess code quality and code coverage, to validate code changes made by developers or automated tools, and to ensure compatibility with dependencies. Despite its importance, executing the test suite of a project can be challenging in practice because different projects use different programming languages, software ecosystems, build systems, testing frameworks, and other tools. These challenges make it difficult to create a reliable, universal test execution method that works across different projects. This paper presents ExecutionAgent, an automated technique that prepares scripts for building an arbitrary project from source code and running its test cases. Inspired by the way a human developer would address this task, our approach is a large language model (LLM)-based agent that autonomously executes commands and interacts with the host system. The agent uses meta-prompting to gather guidelines on the latest technologies related to the given project, and it iteratively refines its process based on feedback from the previous steps. Our evaluation applies ExecutionAgent to 50 open-source projects that use 14 different programming languages and many different build and testing tools. The approach successfully executes the test suites of 33/50 projects, while matching the test results of ground truth test suite executions with a deviation of only 7.5%. These results improve over the best previously available technique by 6.6x. The costs imposed by the approach are reasonable, with an execution time of 74 minutes and LLM costs of USD 0.16, on average per project. We envision ExecutionAgent to serve as a valuable tool for developers, automated programming tools, and researchers that need to execute tests across a wide variety of projects. CCS Concepts: • Software and its engineering → Development frameworks and environments;
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 38e3394e-7559-4cdb-a887-ac469263b66fCited by top-tier papers18
- Process-Level Trajectory Evaluation for Environment Configuration in Software Engineering AgentsJiayi Kuang, Yinghui Li, Xin Zhang, Yangning Li et al.ICLR 2026 · 18 citations
- Agentic Concolic ExecutionZhengxiong Luo, Huan Zhao, Dylan Wolff, Cristian Cadar et al.S&P 2026 · 17 citations
- Seeing is Fixing: Cross-Modal Reasoning with Multimodal LLMs for Visual Software Issue RepairKai Huang, Jian Zhang, Xiaofei Xie, Chunyang ChenASE 2025 · 5 citations
- PoCGen: Generating Proof-of-Concept Exploits for Vulnerabilities in Npm PackagesDeniz Simsek, Aryaz Eghbali, Michael PradelFSE 2026 · 4 citations
- Understanding Software Engineering Agents: A Study of Thought-Action-Result TrajectoriesIslem Bouzenia, Michael PradelASE 2025 · 3 citations
Builds on23
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use ToolsTimo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessì, Roberta Raileanu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,989 citations
- Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code GenerationJiawei Liu, Chunqiu Steven Xia, Yuyao Wang, Lingming ZhangNeurIPS 2023 · 2,317 citations
- SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-world Github Issues?Carlos E. Jimenez, John Yang, Alexander Wettig, Shunyu Yao et al.ICLR 2024 · 2,082 citations
- SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software EngineeringJohn Yang, Carlos E. Jimenez, Alexander Wettig, Kilian Lieret et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 2,059 citations
Related papers
- Repo2Run: Automated Building Executable Environment for Code Repository at ScaleRuida Hu, Chao Peng, Xinchen Wang, Junjielong Xu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 49 citations
- CodeAgent: Enhancing Code Generation with Tool-Integrated Agent Systems for Real-World Repo-level Coding ChallengesKechi Zhang, Jia Li, Ge Li, Xianjie Shi et al.ACL 2024
- RefAgent: A Multi-agent LLM-based Framework for Automatic Software RefactoringKhouloud Oueslati, Maxime Lamothe, Foutse KhomhICSE 2026 · 1 citation
- Enhancing Open-Domain Task-Solving Capability of LLMs via Autonomous Tool Integration from GitHubBohan Lyu, Xin Cong, Heyang Yu, Pan Yang et al.ACL 2025
- MatchFixAgent: Language-Agnostic Autonomous Repository-Level Code Translation Validation and RepairAli Reza Ibrahimzada, Brandon Paulsen, Reyhaneh Jabbarvand, Joey Dodds et al.ICML 2026 · 9 citations
