Beyond Skin Tone: A Multidimensional Measure of Apparent Skin Color
William Thong, Przemyslaw Joniak, Alice Xiang
Abstract
This paper strives to measure apparent skin color in computer vision, beyond a unidimensional scale on skin tone. In their seminal paper Gender Shades, Buolamwini and Gebru have shown how gender classification systems can be biased against women with darker skin tones. Subsequently, fairness researchers and practitioners have adopted the Fitzpatrick skin type classification as a common measure to assess skin color bias in computer vision systems. While effective, the Fitzpatrick scale only focuses on the skin tone ranging from light to dark. Towards a more comprehensive measure of skin color, we introduce the hue angle ranging from red to yellow. When applied to images, the hue dimension reveals additional biases related to skin color in both computer vision datasets and models. We then recommend multidimensional skin color scales, relying on both skin tone and hue, for fairness assessments.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 465207aa-3691-4a65-bf01-c7526e339e1aCited by top-tier papers3
- Perceptions in Pixels: Analyzing Perceived Gender and Skin Tone in Real-world Image Search ResultsJeffrey L. Gleason, Avijit Ghosh, Ronald E. Robertson, Christo WilsonWWW 2024 · 4 citations
- Fair Facial Attribute Recognition via Group-Decoupled Vision Transformer with Mask-Guided Correlation SuppressionHuichang Huang, Kunchi Li, Si Chen, Da-Han WangAAAI 2026
- AI-Face: A Million-Scale Demographically Annotated AI-Generated Face Dataset and Fairness BenchmarkLi Lin, Santosh Santosh, Mingyang Wu, Xin Wang et al.CVPR 2025
Builds on11
- Alias-Free Generative Adversarial NetworksTero Karras, Miika Aittala, Samuli Laine, Erik Härkönen et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 2,126 citations
- Balanced Datasets Are Not Enough: Estimating and Mitigating Gender Bias in Deep Image RepresentationsTianlu Wang, Jieyu Zhao, Mark Yatskar, Kai-Wei Chang et al.ICCV 2019 · 469 citations
- Perception Prioritized Training of Diffusion ModelsJooyoung Choi, Jungbeom Lee, Chaehun Shin, Sungwon Kim et al.CVPR 2022 · 172 citations
- Understanding and Evaluating Racial Biases in Image CaptioningDora Zhao, Angelina Wang, Olga RussakovskyICCV 2021 · 165 citations
- Towards Transparency in Dermatology Image Datasets with Skin Tone Annotations by Experts, Crowds, and an AlgorithmMatthew Groh, Caleb Harris, Roxana Daneshjou, Omar Badri et al.CSCW 2022 · 62 citations
Related papers
- FACET: Fairness in Computer Vision Evaluation BenchmarkLaura Gustafson, Chloé Rolland, Nikhila Ravi, Quentin Duval et al.ICCV 2023 · 74 citations
- Muffin: A Framework Toward Multi-Dimension AI Fairness by Uniting Off-the-Shelf ModelsYi Sheng, Junhuan Yang, Lei Yang, Yiyu Shi et al.DAC 2023 · 3 citations
- Men Also Do Laundry: Multi-Attribute Bias AmplificationDora Zhao, Jerone Theodore Alexander Andrews, Alice XiangICML 2023 · 29 citations
- Benchmarking Algorithmic Bias in Face Recognition: An Experimental Approach Using Synthetic Faces and Human EvaluationHao Liang, Pietro Perona, Guha BalakrishnanICCV 2023 · 33 citations
- Quality-Diversity Generative Sampling for Learning with Synthetic DataAllen Chang, Matthew C. Fontaine, Serena Booth, Maja J. Mataric et al.AAAI 2024 · 7 citations
