PIPA: Preference Alignment as Prior-Informed Statistical Estimation
Junbo Li, Zhangyang Wang, Qiang Liu
Abstract
Offline preference alignment for language models such as Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) is favored for its effectiveness and simplicity, eliminating the need for costly reinforcement learning. Various offline algorithms have been developed for different data settings, yet they lack a unified understanding. In this study, we introduce Pior-Informed Preference Alignment (PIPA), a unified, RL-free probabilistic framework that formulates language model preference alignment as a Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) problem with prior constraints. This method effectively accommodates both paired and unpaired data, as well as answer and step-level annotations. We illustrate that DPO and KTO are special cases with different prior constraints within our framework. By integrating different types of prior information, we developed two variations of PIPA: PIPA-M and PIPA-N. Both algorithms demonstrate a 3 ∼ 10% performance enhancement on the GSM8K and MATH benchmarks across all configurations, achieving these gains without additional training or computational costs compared to existing algorithms.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 46512ae5-bb58-4aca-86dc-a3d2ed839b4aBuilds on20
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic OptimizationKawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff, Dan Jurafsky et al.ICML 2024 · 973 citations
Related papers
- LIONs: An Empirically Optimized Approach to Align Language ModelsXiao Yu, Qingyang Wu, Yu Li, Zhou YuEMNLP 2024
- Beyond Pairwise: Empowering LLM Alignment With (Ranked) Choice ModelingYuxuan Tang, Yifan FengICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- Bridging and Modeling Correlations in Pairwise Data for Direct Preference OptimizationYuxin Jiang, Bo Huang, Yufei Wang, Xingshan Zeng et al.ICLR 2025
- Design Considerations in Offline Preference-based RLAlekh Agarwal, Christoph Dann, Teodor Vanislavov MarinovICML 2025
- TokenRatio: Principled Token-Level Preference Optimization via Ratio MatchingTruong Nguyen, Tien-Phat Nguyen, Linh Van, Duy Nguyen et al.ICML 2026
