Bridging and Modeling Correlations in Pairwise Data for Direct Preference Optimization
Yuxin Jiang, Bo Huang, Yufei Wang, Xingshan Zeng, Liangyou Li, Yasheng Wang, Xin Jiang, Lifeng Shang, Ruiming Tang, Wei Wang
Abstract
Direct preference optimization (DPO), a widely adopted offline preference optimization algorithm, aims to align large language models (LLMs) with humandesired behaviors using pairwise preference data. However, the generation of the winning response and the losing response within pairwise data are typically isolated, leading to weak correlations between them as well as suboptimal alignment performance. To address this issue, we propose an effective framework for Bridging and Modeling Correlations in pairwise data, named BMC. Firstly, we increase the consistency and informativeness of the pairwise preference signals through targeted modifications, synthesizing a pseudo-winning response by improving the losing response with the winning response as a reference. Secondly, we identify that DPO alone is insufficient to model these correlations and capture nuanced variations. Therefore, we propose learning token-level correlations by dynamically leveraging the policy model's confidence during training. Comprehensive experiments on QA, math, and instruction-following tasks demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach, significantly surpassing competitive baselines, including DPO. Additionally, our in-depth quantitative analysis reveals the reasons behind our method's superior performance over DPO and showcases its versatility to other DPO variants. We release our repository at https://github.com/YJiangcm/BMC .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 650ffeb6-7b2a-4b65-b40e-12538e78f1dbCited by top-tier papers2
- RevisEval: Improving LLM-as-a-Judge via Response-Adapted ReferencesQiyuan Zhang, Yufei Wang, Tiezheng Yu, Yuxin Jiang et al.ICLR 2025
- Two Heads Are Better Than One: Dual-Model Verbal Reflection at Inference-TimeJiazheng Li, Yuxiang Zhou, Junru Lu, Gladys Tyen et al.EMNLP 2025
Builds on15
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text GenerationWeizhe Yuan, Graham Neubig, Pengfei LiuNeurIPS 2021 · 1,143 citations
- MetaMath: Bootstrap Your Own Mathematical Questions for Large Language ModelsLonghui Yu, Weisen Jiang, Han Shi, Jincheng Yu et al.ICLR 2024 · 637 citations
- RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI FeedbackHarrison Lee, Samrat Phatale, Hassan Mansoor, Thomas Mesnard et al.ICML 2024 · 598 citations
Related papers
- RMO: Towards Better LLM Alignment via Reshaping Reward Margin DistributionsYanchi Ru, Yue Huang, Xiangliang ZhangAAAI 2026 · 1 citation
- TIS-DPO: Token-level Importance Sampling for Direct Preference Optimization With Estimated WeightsAiwei Liu, Haoping Bai, Zhiyun Lu, Yanchao Sun et al.ICLR 2025
- TGDPO: Harnessing Token-Level Reward Guidance for Enhancing Direct Preference OptimizationMingkang Zhu, Xi Chen, Zhongdao Wang, Bei Yu et al.ICML 2025
- Cal-DPO: Calibrated Direct Preference Optimization for Language Model AlignmentTeng Xiao, Yige Yuan, Huaisheng Zhu, Mingxiao Li et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 76 citations
- ConfPO: Exploiting Policy Model Confidence for Critical Token Selection in Preference OptimizationHee Suk Yoon, Eunseop Yoon, Mark A. Hasegawa-Johnson, Sungwoong Kim et al.ICML 2025
