Prioritizing Perception-Guided Self-Supervision: A New Paradigm for Causal Modeling in End-to-End Autonomous Driving
Yi Huang, Zhan Qu, Lihui Jiang, Bingbing Liu, Hongbo Zhang
Abstract
End-to-end autonomous driving systems, predominantly trained through imitation learning, have demonstrated considerable effectiveness in leveraging large-scale expert driving data. Despite their success in open-loop evaluations, these systems often exhibit significant performance degradation in closed-loop scenarios due to causal confusion. This confusion is fundamentally exacerbated by the overreliance of the imitation learning paradigm on expert trajectories, which often contain unattributable noise and interfere with the modeling of causal relationships between environmental contexts and appropriate driving actions. To address this fundamental limitation, we propose Perception-Guided Self-Supervision (PGS) - a simple yet effective training paradigm that leverages perception outputs as the primary supervisory signals, explicitly modeling causal relationships in decision-making. The proposed framework aligns both the inputs and outputs of the decision-making module with perception results, such as lane centerlines and the predicted motions of surrounding agents, by introducing positive and negative self-supervision for the ego trajectory. This alignment is specifically designed to mitigate causal confusion arising from the inherent noise in expert trajectories. Equipped with perception-driven supervision, our method, built on a standard end-to-end architecture, achieves a Driving Score of 78.08 and a mean success rate of 48.64% on the challenging closed-loop Bench2Drive benchmark, significantly outperforming existing state-of-the-art methods, including those employing more complex network architectures and inference pipelines. These results underscore the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed PGS framework and point to a promising direction for addressing causal confusion and enhancing real-world generalization in autonomous driving.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4557f61a-0201-4299-acc1-33007bfa88e9Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on12
- VAD: Vectorized Scene Representation for Efficient Autonomous DrivingBo Jiang, Shaoyu Chen, Qing Xu, Bencheng Liao et al.ICCV 2023 · 602 citations
- Trajectory-guided Control Prediction for End-to-end Autonomous Driving: A Simple yet Strong BaselinePenghao Wu, Xiaosong Jia, Li Chen, Junchi Yan et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 444 citations
- VADv2: End-to-End Vectorized Autonomous Driving via Probabilistic PlanningBo Jiang, Shaoyu Chen, Hao Gao, Bencheng Liao et al.ICLR 2026 · 259 citations
- DriveAdapter: Breaking the Coupling Barrier of Perception and Planning in End-to-End Autonomous DrivingXiaosong Jia, Yulu Gao, Li Chen, Junchi Yan et al.ICCV 2023 · 154 citations
- RAD: Training an End-to-End Driving Policy via Large-Scale 3DGS-based Reinforcement LearningHao Gao, Shaoyu Chen, Bo Jiang, Bencheng Liao et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 92 citations
Related papers
- DriveDPO: Policy Learning via Safety DPO For End-to-End Autonomous DrivingShuyao Shang, Yuntao Chen, Yuqi Wang, Yingyan Li et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 49 citations
- LEAD: Minimizing Learner-Expert Asymmetry in End-to-End DrivingLong Nguyen, Micha Fauth, Bernhard Jaeger, Daniel Dauner et al.CVPR 2026 · 28 citations
- World4Drive: End-to-End Autonomous Driving via Intention-Aware Physical Latent World ModelYupeng Zheng, Pengxuan Yang, Zebin Xing, Qichao Zhang et al.ICCV 2025 · 16 citations
- Enhancing End-to-End Autonomous Driving with Latent World ModelYingyan Li, Lue Fan, Jiawei He, Yuqi Wang et al.ICLR 2025
- Is Ego Status All You Need for Open-Loop End-to-End Autonomous Driving?Zhiqi Li, Zhiding Yu, Shiyi Lan, Jiahan Li et al.CVPR 2024
