"Maybe We Need Some More Examples:" Individual and Team Drivers of Developer GenAI Tool Use
Courtney Miller, Rudrajit Choudhuri, Mara Ulloa, Sankeerti Haniyur, Robert DeLine, Margaret-Anne Storey, Emerson Murphy-Hill, Christian Bird, Jenna L. Butler
Abstract
Despite the widespread availability of generative AI tools in software engineering, developer adoption remains uneven. This unevenness is problematic because it hampers productivity efforts, frustrates management's expectations, and creates uncertainty around the future roles of developers. Through paired interviews with 54 developers across 27 teams -- one frequent and one infrequent user per team -- we demonstrate that differences in usage result primarily from how developers perceive the tool (as a collaborator vs. feature), their engagement approach (experimental vs. conservative), and how they respond when encountering challenges (with adaptive persistence vs. quick abandonment). Our findings imply that widespread organizational expectations for rapid productivity gains without sufficient investment in learning support creates a "Productivity Pressure Paradox," undermining the very productivity benefits that motivate adoption.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 451d8b4d-5aaa-4f24-a731-6b03779ac7e8Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on6
- A Large-Scale Survey on the Usability of AI Programming Assistants: Successes and ChallengesJenny T. Liang, Chenyang Yang, Brad A. MyersICSE 2024 · 126 citations
- Mental Models of AI Agents in a Cooperative Game SettingKaty Ilonka Gero, Zahra Ashktorab, Casey Dugan, Qian Pan et al.CHI 2020 · 116 citations
- Beyond Code Generation: An Observational Study of ChatGPT Usage in Software Engineering PracticeRanim Khojah, Mazen Mohamad, Philipp Leitner, Francisco Gomes de Oliveira NetoFSE 2024 · 56 citations
- How Far Are We? The Triumphs and Trials of Generative AI in Learning Software EngineeringRudrajit Choudhuri, Dylan Liu, Igor Steinmacher, Marco Aurélio Gerosa et al.ICSE 2024 · 43 citations
- Is Resistance Futile?: Early Career Game Developers, Generative AI, and Ethical SkepticismJosiah D. Boucher, Gillian Smith, Yunus Dogan TellielCHI 2024 · 28 citations
Related papers
- What Guides Our Choices? Modeling Developers' Trust and Behavioral Intentions Towards GenaiRudrajit Choudhuri, Bianca Trinkenreich, Rahul Pandita, Eirini Kalliamvakou et al.ICSE 2025 · 9 citations
- Development in times of hype: How freelancers explore Generative AI?Mateusz Dolata, Norbert Lange, Gerhard SchwabeICSE 2024 · 14 citations
- Code with Me or for Me? How Increasing AI Automation Transforms Developer WorkflowsValerie Chen, Ameet Talwalkar, Robert Brennan, Graham NeubigCHI 2026 · 2 citations
- "Game Changer" or "Overenthusiastic Drunk Acquaintance"? Generative AI Use by Blind and Low Vision Software Professionals in the WorkplaceYoonha Cha, Victoria Jackson, Lauren Shu, Stacy Branham et al.ICSE 2026
- From Junior to Senior: Allocating Agency and Navigating Professional Growth in Agentic AI-Mediated Software EngineeringDana Feng, Bhada Yun, April Yi WangCHI 2026 · 2 citations
