Probing for Labeled Dependency Trees
Max Müller-Eberstein, Rob van der Goot, Barbara Plank
Abstract
Probing has become an important tool for analyzing representations in Natural Language Processing (NLP). For graphical NLP tasks such as dependency parsing, linear probes are currently limited to extracting undirected or unlabeled parse trees which do not capture the full task. This work introduces DepProbe, a linear probe which can extract labeled and directed dependency parse trees from embeddings while using fewer parameters and compute than prior methods. Leveraging its full task coverage and lightweight parametrization, we investigate its predictive power for selecting the best transfer language for training a full biaffine attention parser. Across 13 languages, our proposed method identifies the best source treebank 94% of the time, outperforming competitive baselines and prior work. Finally, we analyze the informativeness of task-specific subspaces in contextual embeddings as well as which benefits a full parser’s non-linear parametrization provides.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers4
- A Polar coordinate system represents syntax in large language modelsPablo Diego-Simón, Stéphane d'Ascoli, Emmanuel Chemla, Yair Lakretz et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 27 citations
- Mechanisms vs. Outcomes: Probing for Syntax Fails to Explain Performance on Targeted Syntactic EvaluationsAnanth Agarwal, Jasper Jian, Christopher D. Manning, Shikhar MurtyEMNLP 2025 · 5 citations
- Understanding the Role of Input Token Characters in Language Models: How Does Information Loss Affect Performance?Ahmed Alajrami, Katerina Margatina, Nikolaos AletrasEMNLP 2023 · 1 citation
- An Information-Theoretic Parameter-Free Bayesian Framework for Probing Labeled Dependency Trees from Attention ScoreHongxu Liu, Jing Ma, Xiaojie Wang, Caixia Yuan et al.ICLR 2026
Builds on7
- Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at ScaleAlexis Conneau, Kartikay Khandelwal, Naman Goyal, Vishrav Chaudhary et al.ACL 2020 · 539 citations
- LEEP: A New Measure to Evaluate Transferability of Learned RepresentationsCuong V. Nguyen, Tal Hassner, Matthias W. Seeger, Cédric ArchambeauICML 2020 · 279 citations
- LogME: Practical Assessment of Pre-trained Models for Transfer LearningKaichao You, Yong Liu, Jianmin Wang, Mingsheng LongICML 2021 · 253 citations
- Finding Universal Grammatical Relations in Multilingual BERTEthan A. Chi, John Hewitt, Christopher D. ManningACL 2020 · 7 citations
- A Root of a Problem: Optimizing Single-Root Dependency ParsingMilos Stanojevic, Shay B. CohenEMNLP 2021 · 5 citations
Related papers
- Perturbed Masking: Parameter-free Probing for Analyzing and Interpreting BERTZhiyong Wu, Yun Chen, Ben Kao, Qun LiuACL 2020 · 158 citations
- Fast and Accurate Non-Projective Dependency Tree LinearizationXiang Yu, Simon Tannert, Ngoc Thang Vu, Jonas KuhnACL 2020 · 3 citations
- Substructure Distribution Projection for Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Dependency ParsingFreda Shi, Kevin Gimpel, Karen LivescuACL 2022 · 10 citations
- Dependency Parsing is More Parameter-Efficient with NormalizationPaolo Gajo, Domenic Rosati, Hassan Sajjad, Alberto Barrón-CedeñoNeurIPS 2025
- Probing BERT in Hyperbolic SpacesBoli Chen, Yao Fu, Guangwei Xu, Pengjun Xie et al.ICLR 2021 · 19 citations
