Understanding the Role of Input Token Characters in Language Models: How Does Information Loss Affect Performance?
Ahmed Alajrami, Katerina Margatina, Nikolaos Aletras
Abstract
Understanding how and what pre-trained language models (PLMs) learn about language is an open challenge in natural language processing. Previous work has focused on identifying whether they capture semantic and syntactic information, and how the data or the pre-training objective affects their performance. However, to the best of our knowledge, no previous work has specifically examined how information loss in input token characters affects the performance of PLMs. In this study, we address this gap by pre-training language models using small subsets of characters from individual tokens. Surprisingly, we find that pre-training even under extreme settings, i.e. using only one character of each token, the performance retention in standard NLU benchmarks and probing tasks compared to full-token models is high. For instance, a model pre-trained only on single first characters from tokens achieves performance retention of approximately 90% and 77% of the full-token model in SuperGLUE and GLUE tasks, respectively. 1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ff187982-57f6-47b2-abd4-d8f45d6d63d7Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on16
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language RepresentationsZhenzhong Lan, Mingda Chen, Sebastian Goodman, Kevin Gimpel et al.ICLR 2020 · 7,418 citations
- ELECTRA: Pre-training Text Encoders as Discriminators Rather Than GeneratorsKevin Clark, Minh-Thang Luong, Quoc V. Le, Christopher D. ManningICLR 2020 · 541 citations
- Semantics-Aware BERT for Language UnderstandingZhuosheng Zhang, Yuwei Wu, Hai Zhao, Zuchao Li et al.AAAI 2020 · 396 citations
- Masked Language Modeling and the Distributional Hypothesis: Order Word Matters Pre-training for LittleKoustuv Sinha, Robin Jia, Dieuwke Hupkes, Joelle Pineau et al.EMNLP 2021 · 177 citations
Related papers
- On the Transferability of Pre-trained Language Models: A Study from Artificial DatasetsDavid Cheng-Han Chiang, Hung-Yi LeeAAAI 2022 · 33 citations
- Word Order Does Matter and Shuffled Language Models Know ItMostafa Abdou, Vinit Ravishankar, Artur Kulmizev, Anders SøgaardACL 2022
- Training Trajectories of Language Models Across ScalesMengzhou Xia, Mikel Artetxe, Chunting Zhou, Xi Victoria Lin et al.ACL 2023 · 12 citations
- What Context Features Can Transformer Language Models Use?Joe O'Connor, Jacob AndreasACL 2021
- CharBench: Evaluating the Role of Tokenization in Character-Level TasksOmri Uzan, Yuval PinterAAAI 2026 · 3 citations
