Just Adjust One Prompt: Enhancing In-Context Dialogue Scoring via Constructing the Optimal Subgraph of Demonstrations and Prompts
Jiashu Pu, Ling Cheng, Lu Fan, Tangjie Lv, Rongsheng Zhang
Abstract
The use of modern Large Language Models (LLMs) as chatbots still has some problems such as hallucinations and lack of empathy. Identifying these issues can help improve chatbot performance. The community has been continually iterating on reference-free dialogue evaluation methods based on large language models (LLMs) that can be readily applied. However, many of these LLM-based metrics require selecting specific datasets and developing specialized training tasks for different evaluation dimensions (e.g., coherence, informative). The developing step can be time-consuming and may need to be repeated for new evaluation dimensions. To enable efficient and flexible adaptation to diverse needs of dialogue evaluation, we propose a dimension-agnostic scoring method that leverages the in-context learning (ICL) capability of LLMs to learn from human scoring to the fullest extent. Our method has three key features. To begin with, rather than manual prompt crafting, we propose automatically generating prompts, allowing the LLM to observe human labels and summarize the most suitable prompt. Additionally, since the LLM has a token limit and ICL is sensitive to demonstration variations, we train a selector to finely customize demonstrations and prompts for each dialogue input. Finally, during inference, we propose to request the LLM multiple times with a subgraph of demonstrations and prompts that are diverse and suitable to maximize ICL from various human scoring. We validate the efficacy of our method on five datasets, even with a small amount of annotated data, our method outperforms all strong baselines. Code is available at https://github.com/iamlxb3/EMNLP2023-ADOROR.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 44d21a82-8a96-450d-bdc9-38289091f46aBuilds on10
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- The Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationAri Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes et al.ICLR 2020 · 4,112 citations
- Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-shot Performance of Language ModelsZihao Zhao, Eric Wallace, Shi Feng, Dan Klein et al.ICML 2021 · 1,843 citations
- AutoPrompt: Eliciting Knowledge from Language Models with Automatically Generated PromptsTaylor Shin, Yasaman Razeghi, Robert L. Logan IV, Eric Wallace et al.EMNLP 2020 · 1,162 citations
- BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text GenerationWeizhe Yuan, Graham Neubig, Pengfei LiuNeurIPS 2021 · 1,143 citations
Related papers
- A Comprehensive Analysis of the Effectiveness of Large Language Models as Automatic Dialogue EvaluatorsChen Zhang, Luis Fernando D'Haro, Yiming Chen, Malu Zhang et al.AAAI 2024 · 57 citations
- One Prompt To Rule Them All: LLMs for Opinion Summary EvaluationTejpalsingh Siledar, Swaroop Nath, Sankara Sri Raghava Ravindra Muddu, Rupasai Rangaraju et al.ACL 2024
- LLM-Powered Benchmark Factory: Reliable, Generic, and EfficientPeiwen Yuan, Shaoxiong Feng, Yiwei Li, Xinglin Wang et al.ACL 2026 · 8 citations
- Auto-PRE: An Automatic and Cost-Efficient Peer-Review Framework for Language Generation EvaluationJunjie Chen, Weihang Su, Zhumin Chu, Haitao Li et al.AAAI 2026
- Beyond Utility: Evaluating LLM as RecommenderChumeng Jiang, Jiayin Wang, Weizhi Ma, Charles L. A. Clarke et al.WWW 2025 · 22 citations
