Syntactic Substitutability as Unsupervised Dependency Syntax
Jasper Jian, Siva Reddy
Abstract
Syntax is a latent hierarchical structure which underpins the robust and compositional nature of human language. In this work, we explore the hypothesis that syntactic dependencies can be represented in language model attention distributions and propose a new method to induce these structures theory-agnostically. Instead of modeling syntactic relations as defined by annotation schemata, we model a more general property implicit in the definition of dependency relations, syntactic substitutability. This property captures the fact that words at either end of a dependency can be substituted with words from the same category. Substitutions can be used to generate a set of syntactically invariant sentences whose representations are then used for parsing. We show that increasing the number of substitutions used improves parsing accuracy on natural data. On long-distance subject-verb agreement constructions, our method achieves 79.5% recall compared to 8.9% using a previous method. Our method also provides improvements when transferred to a different parsing setup, demonstrating that it generalizes.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 44ae4853-7a70-4e69-864e-6aadbfd28edaCited by top-tier papers2
- Mechanisms vs. Outcomes: Probing for Syntax Fails to Explain Performance on Targeted Syntactic EvaluationsAnanth Agarwal, Jasper Jian, Christopher D. Manning, Shikhar MurtyEMNLP 2025 · 5 citations
- Inducing Systematicity in Transformers by Attending to Structurally Quantized EmbeddingsYichen Jiang, Xiang Zhou, Mohit BansalACL 2024
Builds on4
- Perturbed Masking: Parameter-free Probing for Analyzing and Interpreting BERTZhiyong Wu, Yun Chen, Ben Kao, Qun LiuACL 2020 · 158 citations
- Are Pre-trained Language Models Aware of Phrases? Simple but Strong Baselines for Grammar InductionTaeuk Kim, Jihun Choi, Daniel Edmiston, Sang-goo LeeICLR 2020 · 92 citations
- Linguistic Dependencies and Statistical DependenceJacob Louis Hoover, Wenyu Du, Alessandro Sordoni, Timothy J. O'DonnellEMNLP 2021 · 2 citations
- Do Neural Language Models Show Preferences for Syntactic Formalisms?Artur Kulmizev, Vinit Ravishankar, Mostafa Abdou, Joakim NivreACL 2020 · 1 citation
Related papers
- Different types of syntactic agreement recruit the same units within large language modelsDaria Kryvosheieva, Andrea Gregor de Varda, Evelina Fedorenko, Greta TuckuteACL 2026 · 3 citations
- Causal Interventions Reveal Shared Structure Across English Filler-Gap ConstructionsSasha Boguraev, Christopher Potts, Kyle MahowaldEMNLP 2025
- Unsupervised Vision-Language Parsing: Seamlessly Bridging Visual Scene Graphs with Language Structures via Dependency RelationshipsChao Lou, Wenjuan Han, Yuhuan Lin, Zilong ZhengCVPR 2022 · 9 citations
- Syntax and Geometry of InformationRaphaël Bailly, Laurent Leblond, Kata GáborACL 2023
- Dependency resolution at the syntax-semantics interface: psycholinguistic and computational insights on control dependenciesIria de-Dios-Flores, Juan Garcia Amboage, Marcos GarcíaACL 2023 · 2 citations
