Causal Interventions Reveal Shared Structure Across English Filler-Gap Constructions
Sasha Boguraev, Christopher Potts, Kyle Mahowald
Abstract
Language Models (LMs) have emerged as powerful sources of evidence for linguists seeking to develop theories of syntax. In this paper, we argue that causal interpretability methods, applied to LMs, can greatly enhance the value of such evidence by helping us characterize the abstract mechanisms that LMs learn to use. Our empirical focus is a set of English filler-gap dependency constructions (e.g., questions, relative clauses). Linguistic theories largely agree that these constructions share many properties. Using experiments based in Distributed Interchange Interventions, we show that LMs converge on similar abstract analyses of these constructions. These analyses also reveal previously overlooked factorsrelating to frequency, filler type, and surrounding context -that could motivate changes to standard linguistic theory. Overall, these results suggest that mechanistic, internal analyses of LMs can push linguistic theory forward. https://github.com/SashaBoguraev/ causal-filler-gap
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 426e17f6-23e5-4655-b625-04bba2de2d37Cited by top-tier papers2
- Different types of syntactic agreement recruit the same units within large language modelsDaria Kryvosheieva, Andrea Gregor de Varda, Evelina Fedorenko, Greta TuckuteACL 2026 · 3 citations
- Fine-Grained Analysis of Shared Syntactic Mechanisms in Language ModelsRyoma Kumon, Hitomi YanakaACL 2026
Builds on9
- Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTKevin Meng, David Bau, Alex Andonian, Yonatan BelinkovNeurIPS 2022 · 3,415 citations
- Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and ScalingStella Biderman, Hailey Schoelkopf, Quentin Gregory Anthony, Herbie Bradley et al.ICML 2023 · 1,822 citations
- Causal Abstractions of Neural NetworksAtticus Geiger, Hanson Lu, Thomas Icard, Christopher PottsNeurIPS 2021 · 516 citations
- Interpretability at Scale: Identifying Causal Mechanisms in AlpacaZhengxuan Wu, Atticus Geiger, Thomas Icard, Christopher Potts et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 146 citations
- A Systematic Assessment of Syntactic Generalization in Neural Language ModelsJennifer Hu, Jon Gauthier, Peng Qian, Ethan Wilcox et al.ACL 2020 · 124 citations
Related papers
- CausalGym: Benchmarking causal interpretability methods on linguistic tasksAryaman Arora, Dan Jurafsky, Christopher PottsACL 2024 · 3 citations
- Mind the Gap: How BabyLMs Learn Filler-Gap DependenciesChi-Yun Chang, Xueyang Huang, Humaira Nasir, Shane Storks et al.EMNLP 2025
- LLM Interpretability with Identifiable Temporal-Instantaneous RepresentationXiangchen Song, Jiaqi Sun, Zijian Li, Yujia Zheng et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 6 citations
- Bridging Internal Consistency and External Alignment: A Causal and Dynamic Interpretability Framework for LLM GenerationShuyao Xiao, Shengling Wang, Ke ChaoACL 2026
- Internal Causal Mechanisms Robustly Predict Language Model Out-of-Distribution BehaviorsJing Huang, Junyi Tao, Thomas Icard, Diyi Yang et al.ICML 2025
