Integrating measures of replicability into scholarly search: Challenges and opportunities
Chuhao Wu, Tatiana Chakravorti, John M. Carroll, Sarah Rajtmajer
Abstract
Challenges to reproducibility and replicability have gained widespread attention, driven by large replication projects with lukewarm success rates. A nascent work has emerged developing algorithms to estimate the replicability of published findings. The current study explores ways in which AI-enabled signals of confidence in research might be integrated into the literature search. We interview 17 PhD researchers about their current processes for literature search and ask them to provide feedback on a replicability estimation tool. Our findings suggest that participants tend to confuse replicability with generalizability and related concepts. Information about replicability can support researchers throughout the research design processes. However, the use of AI estimation is debatable due to the lack of explainability and transparency. The ethical implications of AI-enabled confidence assessment must be further studied before such tools could be widely accepted. We discuss implications for the design of technological tools to support scholarly activities and advance replicability.
• Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in HCI.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on9
- Expanding Explainability: Towards Social Transparency in AI systemsUpol Ehsan, Q. Vera Liao, Michael J. Muller, Mark O. Riedl et al.CHI 2021 · 505 citations
- "Help Me Help the AI": Understanding How Explainability Can Support Human-AI InteractionSunnie S. Y. Kim, Elizabeth Anne Watkins, Olga Russakovsky, Ruth Fong et al.CHI 2023 · 178 citations
- Augmenting Scientific Papers with Just-in-Time, Position-Sensitive Definitions of Terms and SymbolsAndrew Head, Kyle Lo, Dongyeop Kang, Raymond Fok et al.CHI 2021 · 91 citations
- Reproducibility and Replicability of Web Measurement StudiesNurullah Demir, Matteo Große-Kampmann, Tobias Urban, Christian Wressnegger et al.WWW 2022 · 47 citations
- CiteSee: Augmenting Citations in Scientific Papers with Persistent and Personalized Historical ContextJoseph Chee Chang, Amy X. Zhang, Jonathan Bragg, Andrew Head et al.CHI 2023 · 44 citations
Related papers
- On the Computational Reproducibility of Human-Computer InteractionOlga Iarygina, Kasper Hornbæk, Aske MottelsonCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Code replicability in computer graphicsNicolas Bonneel, David Coeurjolly, Julie Digne, Nicolas MelladoSIGGRAPH 2020 · 21 citations
- Large Language Models in Qualitative Research: Uses, Tensions, and IntentionsHope Schroeder, Marianne Aubin Le Quéré, Casey Randazzo, David Mimno et al.CHI 2025 · 40 citations
- "Look! It's a Computer Program! It's an Algorithm! It's AI!": Does Terminology Affect Human Perceptions and Evaluations of Algorithmic Decision-Making Systems?Markus Langer, Tim Hunsicker, Tina Feldkamp, Cornelius J. König et al.CHI 2022 · 52 citations
- Examining Student and Teacher Perspectives on Undisclosed Use of Generative AI in Academic WorkRudaiba Adnin, Atharva Pandkar, Bingsheng Yao, Dakuo Wang et al.CHI 2025 · 15 citations
