PerFit: Exploring Personalization Shifts in Representation Space of LLMs
Jiahong Liu, Wenhao Yu, Quanyu Dai, Zhongyang Li, Jieming Zhu, Menglin Yang, Tat-Seng Chua, Irwin King
Abstract
Personalization has become a pivotal field of study in contemporary intelligent systems. While large language models (LLMs) excel at general knowledge tasks, they often struggle with personalization, i.e., adapting their outputs to individual user expectations. Existing approaches that steer LLM behavior to meet users' implicit preferences and behavior patterns, primarily relying on tune-free methods (e.g., RAG, PAG) or parameter fine-tuning methods (e.g., LoRA), face challenges in effectively balancing effectiveness and efficiency. Moreover, the mechanisms underlying personalized preferences remain underexplored. To address these challenges, we first uncover key patterns of user-specific information embedded in the representation space. Specifically, we find that (1) personalized information lies within a low-rank subspace represented by vectors, and (2) these vectors demonstrate both a collective shift shared across users and a personalized shift unique to each individual user. Building on these insights, we introduce PerFit, a novel two-stage solution that directly fine-tunes interventions in the hidden representation space by addressing both collective and user-specific shifts, thereby achieving precise steering of LLM with minimal parameter overhead. Experimental results demonstrate that PerFit delivers strong performance across six datasets while cutting the number of parameters by an average of 92.3% compared to the state-of-the-art method. The code is available at the homepage.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4447f98f-510e-4ada-8c08-fe40f5a8fd05Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on31
- Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTKevin Meng, David Bau, Alex Andonian, Yonatan BelinkovNeurIPS 2022 · 3,415 citations
- Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language ModelKenneth Li, Oam Patel, Fernanda B. Viégas, Hanspeter Pfister et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,549 citations
- Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single DirectionAndy Arditi, Oscar Obeso, Aaquib Syed, Daniel Paleka et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 1,166 citations
- Large Language Models Can Be Easily Distracted by Irrelevant ContextFreda Shi, Xinyun Chen, Kanishka Misra, Nathan Scales et al.ICML 2023 · 970 citations
- The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language ModelsKiho Park, Yo Joong Choe, Victor VeitchICML 2024 · 461 citations
Related papers
- FlatLand: Personalized Graph Federated Learning via Tailored Lorentz SpaceJiahong Liu, Ram Samarth B B, Xinyu Fu, Menglin Yang et al.ICML 2026
- PROPER: A Progressive Learning Framework for Personalized Large Language Models with Group-Level AdaptationLinhai Zhang, Jialong Wu, Deyu Zhou, Yulan HeACL 2025 · 14 citations
- LoFiT: Localized Fine-tuning on LLM RepresentationsFangcong Yin, Xi Ye, Greg DurrettNeurIPS 2024 · 74 citations
- Democratizing Large Language Models via Personalized Parameter-Efficient Fine-tuningZhaoxuan Tan, Qingkai Zeng, Yijun Tian, Zheyuan Liu et al.EMNLP 2024 · 17 citations
- LLMs + Persona-Plug = Personalized LLMsJiongnan Liu, Yutao Zhu, Shuting Wang, Xiaochi Wei et al.ACL 2025 · 19 citations
