Influence of Haptic Feedback on Perception of Threat and Peripersonal Space in Social VR
Vojtech Smekal, Jeanne Hecquard, Sophie Kühne, Nicole Occidental, Anatole Lécuyer, Marc J.-M. Macé, Béatrice de Gelder
Abstract
Humans experience social interactions partly through nonverbal communication, including proxemic behaviors and haptic sensations. Body language, facial expressions, personal spaces, and social touch are multiple factors influencing how a stranger's approach is experienced. Furthermore, the rise of virtual social platforms raises concerns about virtual harassment and the perception of personal space in VR: harassment is felt much more strongly in virtual spaces, and the psychological effects can be just as severe. While most virtual platforms have a 'personal bubble' feature that keeps strangers at a distance, it does not seem to suffice: personal space violations seem influenced by more than simply distance. With this paper, we aim to further clarify the variability of personal spaces. We focus on haptic stimulation, elaborating our hypotheses on the relationship between social touch and the perception of personal spaces. Users wore a haptic compression belt and were immersed in a virtual dark alley. Virtual agents approached them while exhibiting either neutral or threatening body language. In half of all trials, as the agent advanced, the compression belt tightened around the users' torsos with three different pressures. Participants could press a response button when uncomfortable with the agent's proximity. Peripersonal space violations occurred 31% earlier on average when the agent was visibly angry and the compression belt activated. A greater tightening pressure also slightly increased the personal sphere radius by up to 13%. Overall, our results are consistent with previous works on peripersonal spaces. They help further define our relationship to personal space boundaries and encourage using haptic devices during simulated social interactions in VR.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 43de1229-e8c3-46d6-ad5f-1f79177cb5cfBuilds on2
- A Human Touch: Social Touch Increases the Perceived Human-likeness of Agents in Virtual RealityMatthias Hoppe, Beat Rossmy, Daniel Peter Neumann, Stephan Streuber et al.CHI 2020 · 72 citations
- Persuasive Vibrations: Effects of Speech-Based Vibrations on Persuasion, Leadership, and Co-Presence During Verbal Communication in VRJustine Saint-Aubert, Ferran Argelaguet, Marc J.-M. Macé, Claudio Pacchierotti et al.IEEE VR 2023 · 12 citations
Related papers
- How Harassment Shapes Self-Perception and Well-Being in Social VR: Evidence from a Controlled Lab StudyJonathan Tschanter, Christian Merz, Carolin Wienrich, Marc Erich LatoschikIEEE VR 2026
- The Impact of Embodiment and Avatar Sizing on Personal Space in Immersive Virtual EnvironmentsLauren E. Buck, Soumyajit Chakraborty, Bobby BodenheimerIEEE VR 2022 · 36 citations
- Determining Peripersonal Space Boundaries and Their Plasticity in Relation to Object and Agent Characteristics in an Immersive Virtual EnvironmentLauren E. Buck, Sohee Park, Bobby BodenheimerIEEE VR 2020 · 7 citations
- Protecting Personal Space in Social Virtual Worlds: The Impact of Proximity-Control Features on Adoption IntentionRunjie Xie, Florian Franke, Sandra Birnstiel, Benedikt MorschheuserIEEE VR 2026
- Haptic Biosignals Affect Proxemics Toward Virtual Reality AgentsSimone Ooms, Minha Lee, Ekaterina R. Stepanova, Pablo César et al.CHI 2025 · 5 citations
