AutoAdvExBench: Benchmarking Autonomous Exploitation of Adversarial Example Defenses
Nicholas Carlini, Edoardo Debenedetti, Javier Rando, Milad Nasr, Florian Tramèr
Abstract
We introduce AutoAdvExBench, a benchmark to evaluate if large language models (LLMs) can autonomously exploit defenses to adversarial examples. Unlike existing security benchmarks that often serve as proxies for real-world tasks, AutoAdvExBench directly measures LLMs' success on tasks regularly performed by machine learning security experts. This approach offers a significant advantage: if a LLM could solve the challenges presented in AutoAdvExBench, it would immediately present practical utility for adversarial machine learning researchers. We then design a strong agent that is capable of breaking 75% of CTF-like ("homework exercise") adversarial example defenses. However, we show that this agent is only able to succeed on 13% of the real-world defenses in our benchmark, indicating the large gap between difficulty in attacking "real" code, and CTF-like code. In contrast, a stronger LLM that can attack 21% of real defenses only succeeds on 54% of CTF-like defenses. We make this benchmark available at https://github.com/ethz-spylab/AutoAdvExBench .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 438e74fc-ccc0-4122-b1a5-febad22aad8bCited by top-tier papers6
- CyberGym: Evaluating AI Agents' Real-World Cybersecurity Capabilities at ScaleZhun Wang, Tianneng Shi, Jingxuan He, Matthew Cai et al.ICLR 2026 · 83 citations
- Cyber-Zero: Training Cybersecurity Agents without RuntimeTerry Yue Zhuo, Dingmin Wang, Hantian Ding, Varun Kumar et al.ICLR 2026 · 22 citations
- Comparing AI Agents to Cybersecurity Professionals in Real-World Penetration TestingJustin W. Lin, Eliot Jones, Donovan Jasper, Ethan Ho et al.ICLR 2026 · 18 citations
- Training Language Model Agents to Find Vulnerabilities with CTF-DojoTerry Yue Zhuo, Dingmin Wang, Hantian Ding, Varun Kumar et al.ICML 2026 · 12 citations
- HackWorld: Evaluating Computer-Use Agents on Exploiting Web Application VulnerabilitiesXiaoxue Ren, Penghao Jiang, Kaixin Li, Zhiyong Huang et al.ICLR 2026 · 3 citations
Builds on24
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations Against Deep Neural NetworksNicolas Papernot, Patrick D. McDaniel, Xi Wu, Somesh Jha et al.S&P 2016 · 3,275 citations
- SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software EngineeringJohn Yang, Carlos E. Jimenez, Alexander Wettig, Kilian Lieret et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 2,059 citations
- Feature Squeezing: Detecting Adversarial Examples in Deep Neural NetworksWeilin Xu, David Evans, Yanjun QiNDSS 2018 · 1,633 citations
Related papers
- CVE-Bench: A Benchmark for AI Agents' Ability to Exploit Real-World Web Application VulnerabilitiesYuxuan Zhu, Antony Kellermann, Dylan Bowman, Philip Li et al.ICML 2025 · 1 citation
- SEC-bench: Automated Benchmarking of LLM Agents on Real-World Software Security TasksHwiwon Lee, Ziqi Zhang, Hanxiao Lu, Lingming ZhangNeurIPS 2025 · 86 citations
- PACEbench: A Framework for Evaluating Practical AI Cyber-Exploitation CapabilitiesZicheng Liu, Lige Huang, Jie Zhang, Dongrui Liu et al.ICLR 2026 · 6 citations
- AutoBaxBuilder: Bootstrapping Code Security BenchmarkingTobias von Arx, Niels Mündler, Mark Vero, Maximilian Baader et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust RefusalMantas Mazeika, Long Phan, Xuwang Yin, Andy Zou et al.ICML 2024 · 1,031 citations
