PL4XGL: A Programming Language Approach to Explainable Graph Learning
Minseok Jeon, Jihyeok Park, Hakjoo Oh
Abstract
In this article, we present a new, language-based approach to explainable graph learning. Though graph neural networks (GNNs) have shown impressive performance in various graph learning tasks, they have severe limitations in explainability, hindering their use in decision-critical applications. To address these limitations, several GNN explanation techniques have been proposed using a post-hoc explanation approach providing subgraphs as explanations for classification results. Unfortunately, however, they have two fundamental drawbacks in terms of 1) additional explanation costs and 2) the correctness of the explanations. This paper aims to address these problems by developing a new graph-learning method based on programming language techniques. Our key idea is two-fold: 1) designing a graph description language (GDL) to explain the classification results and 2) developing a new GDL-based interpretable classification model instead of GNN-based models. Our graph-learning model, called PL4XGL, consists of a set of candidate GDL programs with labels and quality scores. For a given graph component, it searches the best GDL program describing the component and provides the corresponding label as the classification result and the program as the explanation. In our approach, learning from data is formulated as a program-synthesis problem, and we present top-down and bottom-up algorithms for synthesizing GDL programs from training data. Evaluation using widely-used datasets demonstrates that PL4XGL produces high-quality explanations that outperform those produced by the state-of-the-art GNN explanation technique, SubgraphX. We also show that PL4XGL achieves competitive classification accuracy comparable to popular GNN models.
• Software and its engineering → Domain specific languages.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 431844ff-4c4c-4b39-8ad1-40e8c3dbd00cCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on14
- Geom-GCN: Geometric Graph Convolutional NetworksHongbin Pei, Bingzhe Wei, Kevin Chen-Chuan Chang, Yu Lei et al.ICLR 2020 · 1,445 citations
- Parameterized Explainer for Graph Neural NetworkDongsheng Luo, Wei Cheng, Dongkuan Xu, Wenchao Yu et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 888 citations
- On Explainability of Graph Neural Networks via Subgraph ExplorationsHao Yuan, Haiyang Yu, Jie Wang, Kang Li et al.ICML 2021 · 498 citations
- PGM-Explainer: Probabilistic Graphical Model Explanations for Graph Neural NetworksMinh N. Vu, My T. ThaiNeurIPS 2020 · 437 citations
- Discovering Invariant Rationales for Graph Neural NetworksYingxin Wu, Xiang Wang, An Zhang, Xiangnan He et al.ICLR 2022 · 313 citations
Related papers
- On Logic-based Self-Explainable Graph Neural NetworksAlessio Ragno, Marc Plantevit, Céline RobardetNeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Task-Agnostic Graph ExplanationsYaochen Xie, Sumeet Katariya, Xianfeng Tang, Edward W. Huang et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 37 citations
- XGNN: Towards Model-Level Explanations of Graph Neural NetworksHao Yuan, Jiliang Tang, Xia Hu, Shuiwang JiKDD 2020 · 261 citations
- DEGREE: Decomposition Based Explanation for Graph Neural NetworksQizhang Feng, Ninghao Liu, Fan Yang, Ruixiang Tang et al.ICLR 2022 · 33 citations
- Generative Causal Explanations for Graph Neural NetworksWanyu Lin, Hao Lan, Baochun LiICML 2021 · 217 citations
