USENIX Security2020Top-tier venue
V0LTpwn: Attacking x86 Processor Integrity from Software
Zijo Kenjar, Tommaso Frassetto, David Gens, Michael Franz, Ahmad-Reza Sadeghi
Abstract
Fault-injection attacks have been proven in the past to be a reliable way of bypassing hardware-based security measures, such as cryptographic hashes, privilege and access permission enforcement, and trusted execution environments. However, traditional fault-injection attacks require physical presence, and hence, were often considered out of scope in many real-world adversary settings. In this paper we show this assumption may no longer be justified. We present V0LTpwn, a novel hardware-oriented but software-controlled attack that affects the integrity of computation in virtually any execution mode on modern x86 processors. To the best of our knowledge, this represents the first attack on x86 integrity from software. The key idea behind our attack is to undervolt a physical core to force non-recoverable hardware faults. Under a V0LTpwn attack, CPU instructions will continue to execute with erroneous results and without crashes, allowing for exploitation. In contrast to recently presented side-channel attacks that leverage vulnerable speculative execution, V0LTpwn is not limited to information disclosure, but allows adversaries to affect execution, and hence, effectively breaks the integrity goals of modern x86 platforms. In our detailed evaluation we successfully launch software-based attacks against Intel SGX enclaves from a privileged process to demonstrate that a V0LTpwn attack can successfully change the results of computations within enclave execution across multiple CPU revisions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 41d8ca81-5d6b-4111-a0b7-accdb1fa8262Cited by top-tier papers23
- DeepSteal: Advanced Model Extractions Leveraging Efficient Weight Stealing in MemoriesAdnan Siraj Rakin, Md Hafizul Islam Chowdhuryy, Fan Yao, Deliang FanS&P 2022 · 163 citations
- VoltPillager: Hardware-based fault injection attacks against Intel SGX Enclaves using the SVID voltage scaling interfaceZitai Chen, Georgios Vasilakis, Kit Murdock, Edward Dean et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 127 citations
- SoK: SGX.Fail: How Stuff Gets eXposedStephan van Schaik, Alexander Seto, Thomas Yurek, Adam Batori et al.S&P 2024 · 52 citations
- PKRU-safe: automatically locking down the heap between safe and unsafe languagesPaul Kirth, Mitchel Dickerson, Stephen Crane, Per Larsen et al.EuroSys 2022 · 41 citations
- CacheWarp: Software-based Fault Injection using Selective State ResetRuiyi Zhang, Lukas Gerlach, Daniel Weber, Lorenz Hetterich et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 36 citations
Builds on14
- RIDL: Rogue In-Flight Data LoadStephan van Schaik, Alyssa Milburn, Sebastian Österlund, Pietro Frigo et al.S&P 2019 · 408 citations
- Plundervolt: Software-based Fault Injection Attacks against Intel SGXKit Murdock, David F. Oswald, Flavio D. Garcia, Jo Van Bulck et al.S&P 2020 · 369 citations
- Translation Leak-aside Buffer: Defeating Cache Side-channel Protections with TLB AttacksBen Gras, Kaveh Razavi, Herbert Bos, Cristiano GiuffridaUSENIX Security 2018 · 357 citations
- Telling Your Secrets without Page Faults: Stealthy Page Table-Based Attacks on Enclaved ExecutionJo Van Bulck, Nico Weichbrodt, Rüdiger Kapitza, Frank Piessens et al.USENIX Security 2017 · 316 citations
- Flip Feng Shui: Hammering a Needle in the Software StackKaveh Razavi, Ben Gras, Erik Bosman, Bart Preneel et al.USENIX Security 2016 · 306 citations
Related papers
- Foreshadow: Extracting the Keys to the Intel SGX Kingdom with Transient Out-of-Order ExecutionJo Van Bulck, Marina Minkin, Ofir Weisse, Daniel Genkin et al.USENIX Security 2018 · 1,175 citations
- Plug Your Volt: Protecting Intel Processors against Dynamic Voltage Frequency Scaling based Fault AttacksNimish Mishra, Rahul Arvind Mool, Anirban Chakraborty, Debdeep MukhopadhyayDAC 2024 · 3 citations
- T-SGX: Eradicating Controlled-Channel Attacks Against Enclave ProgramsMing-Wei Shih, Sangho Lee, Taesoo Kim, Marcus PeinadoNDSS 2017 · 431 citations
- A Novel GPU Overdrive Fault AttackMajid Sabbagh, Yunsi Fei, David R. KaeliDAC 2020 · 22 citations
- A Bad Dream: Subverting Trusted Platform Module While You Are SleepingSeunghun Han, Wook Shin, Jun-Hyeok Park, Hyoung-Chun KimUSENIX Security 2018 · 34 citations
