Interview Evaluation: A Novel Approach for Automatic Evaluation of Conversational Question Answering Models
Xibo Li, Bowei Zou, Yifan Fan, Yanling Li, Ai Ti Aw, Yu Hong
Abstract
Conversational Question Answering (CQA) aims to provide natural language answers to users in information-seeking dialogues. Existing CQA benchmarks often evaluate models using pre-collected human-human conversations. However, replacing the model-predicted dialogue history with ground truth compromises the naturalness and sustainability of CQA evaluation. While previous studies proposed using predicted history and rewriting techniques to address unresolved coreferences and incoherencies, this approach renders the question self-contained from the conversation. In this paper, we propose a novel automatic evaluation approach, interview evaluation. Specifically, ChatGPT acts as the interviewer (Q agent) with a set of carefully designed prompts, and the CQA model under test serves as the interviewee (A agent). During the interview evaluation, questions are dynamically generated by the Q agent to guide the A agent in predicting the correct answer through an interactive process. We evaluated four different models on QuAC and two models on CoQA in our experiments. The experiment results demonstrate that our interview evaluation has advantages over previous CQA evaluation approaches, particularly in terms of naturalness and coherence. The source code is made publicly available. 1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on8
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human BehaviorJoon Sung Park, Joseph C. O'Brien, Carrie Jun Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris et al.UIST 2023 · 1,882 citations
- AutoPrompt: Eliciting Knowledge from Language Models with Automatically Generated PromptsTaylor Shin, Yasaman Razeghi, Robert L. Logan IV, Eric Wallace et al.EMNLP 2020 · 1,162 citations
- Self-Edit: Fault-Aware Code Editor for Code GenerationKechi Zhang, Zhuo Li, Jia Li, Ge Li et al.ACL 2023 · 42 citations
Related papers
- Ditch the Gold Standard: Re-evaluating Conversational Question AnsweringHuihan Li, Tianyu Gao, Manan Goenka, Danqi ChenACL 2022 · 23 citations
- IQA-EVAL: Automatic Evaluation of Human-Model Interactive Question AnsweringRuosen Li, Ruochen Li, Barry Wang, Xinya DuNeurIPS 2024 · 26 citations
- Generating Information-Seeking Conversations from Unlabeled DocumentsGangwoo Kim, Sungdong Kim, Kang Min Yoo, Jaewoo KangEMNLP 2022 · 4 citations
- QGEval: Benchmarking Multi-dimensional Evaluation for Question GenerationWeiping Fu, Bifan Wei, Jianxiang Hu, Zhongmin Cai et al.EMNLP 2024 · 8 citations
- Auto-PRE: An Automatic and Cost-Efficient Peer-Review Framework for Language Generation EvaluationJunjie Chen, Weihang Su, Zhumin Chu, Haitao Li et al.AAAI 2026
