Parallel Repetition of (k1, đots , kμ )-Special-Sound Multi-round Interactive Proofs
Thomas Attema, Serge Fehr
Abstract
In many occasions, the knowledge error κ of an interactive proof is not small enough, and thus needs to be reduced. This can be done generically by repeating the interactive proof in parallel. While there have been many works studying the effect of parallel repetition on the soundness error of interactive proofs and arguments, the effect of parallel repetition on the knowledge error has largely remained unstudied. Only recently it was shown that the t-fold parallel repetition of any interactive protocol reduces the knowledge error from κ down to κ t +ν for any non-negligible term ν. This generic result is suboptimal in that it does not give the knowledge error κ t that one would expect for typical protocols, and, worse, the knowledge error remains non-negligible. In this work we show that indeed the t-fold parallel repetition of any (k1, . . . , kµ)-special-sound multi-round public-coin interactive proof optimally reduces the knowledge error from κ down to κ t . At the core of our results is an alternative, in some sense more fine-grained, measure of quality of a dishonest prover than its success probability, for which we show that it characterizes when knowledge extraction is possible. This new measure then turns out to be very convenient when it comes to analyzing the parallel repetition of such interactive proofs. While parallel repetition reduces the knowledge error, it is easily seen to increase the completeness error. For this reason, we generalize our result to the case of s-out-of-t threshold parallel repetition, where the verifier accepts if s out of t of the parallel instances are accepting. An appropriately chosen threshold s allows both the knowledge error and completeness error to be reduced simultaneously.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on5
- Bulletproofs: Short Proofs for Confidential Transactions and MoreBenedikt Bünz, Jonathan Bootle, Dan Boneh, Andrew Poelstra et al.S&P 2018 · 1,285 citations
- Sonic: Zero-Knowledge SNARKs from Linear-Size Universal and Updatable Structured Reference StringsMary Maller, Sean Bowe, Markulf Kohlweiss, Sarah MeiklejohnCCS 2019 · 412 citations
- Transparent SNARKs from DARK CompilersBenedikt Bünz, Ben Fisch, Alan SzepieniecEUROCRYPT 2020 · 240 citations
- A Non-PCP Approach to Succinct Quantum-Safe Zero-KnowledgeJonathan Bootle, Vadim Lyubashevsky, Ngoc Khanh Nguyen, Gregor SeilerCRYPTO 2020 · 51 citations
- Compressing Proofs of k-Out-Of-n Partial KnowledgeThomas Attema, Ronald Cramer, Serge FehrCRYPTO 2021 · 42 citations
Related papers
- Parallel Repetition for Post-Quantum ArgumentsAndrew Huang, Yael Tauman KalaiFOCS 2025 · 1 citation
- A Tight Parallel Repetition Theorem for Partially Simulatable Interactive Arguments via Smooth KL-DivergenceItay Berman, Iftach Haitner, Eliad TsfadiaCRYPTO 2020 · 4 citations
- Fiat-Shamir via list-recoverable codes (or: parallel repetition of GMW is not zero-knowledge)Justin Holmgren, Alex Lombardi, Ron D. RothblumSTOC 2021
- Parallel repetition for all 3-player games over binary alphabetUma Girish, Justin Holmgren, Kunal Mittal, Ran Raz et al.STOC 2022 · 6 citations
- An Efficient Quantum Parallel Repetition Theorem and ApplicationsJohn Bostanci, Luowen Qian, Nicholas Spooner, Henry YuenSTOC 2024 · 4 citations
