A General Framework for Off-Policy Learning with Partially-Observed Reward
Rikiya Takehi, Masahiro Asami, Kosuke Kawakami, Yuta Saito
Abstract
Off-policy learning (OPL) in contextual bandits aims to learn a decision-making policy that maximizes the target rewards by using only historical interaction data collected under previously developed policies. Unfortunately, when rewards are only partially observed, the effectiveness of OPL degrades severely. Well-known examples of such partial rewards include explicit ratings in content recommendations, conversion signals on e-commerce platforms that are partial due to delay, and the issue of censoring in medical problems. One possible solution to deal with such partial rewards is to use secondary rewards, such as dwelling time, clicks, and medical indicators, which are more densely observed. However, relying solely on such secondary rewards can also lead to poor policy learning since they may not align with the target reward. Thus, this work studies a new and general problem of OPL where the goal is to learn a policy that maximizes the expected target reward by leveraging densely observed secondary rewards as supplemental data. We then propose a new method called Hybrid Policy Optimization for Partially-Observed Reward (HyPeR), which effectively uses the secondary rewards in addition to the partially-observed target reward to achieve effective OPL despite the challenging scenario. We also discuss a case where we aim to optimize not only the expected target reward but also the expected secondary rewards to some extent; counterintuitively, we will show that leveraging the two objectives is in fact advantageous also for the optimization of only the target reward. Along with statistical analysis of our proposed methods, empirical evaluations on both synthetic and real-world data show that HyPeR outperforms existing methods in various scenarios.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 407d0335-9756-40fa-b4c2-b59804e7f771Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on12
- Doubly robust off-policy evaluation with shrinkageYi Su, Maria Dimakopoulou, Akshay Krishnamurthy, Miroslav DudíkICML 2020 · 128 citations
- Off-policy Learning in Two-stage Recommender SystemsJiaqi Ma, Zhe Zhao, Xinyang Yi, Ji Yang et al.WWW 2020 · 106 citations
- Off-Policy Evaluation for Large Action Spaces via EmbeddingsYuta Saito, Thorsten JoachimsICML 2022 · 62 citations
- Subgaussian and Differentiable Importance Sampling for Off-Policy Evaluation and LearningAlberto Maria Metelli, Alessio Russo, Marcello RestelliNeurIPS 2021 · 55 citations
- Adaptive Estimator Selection for Off-Policy EvaluationYi Su, Pavithra Srinath, Akshay KrishnamurthyICML 2020 · 55 citations
Related papers
- Cross-Domain Off-Policy Evaluation and Learning for Contextual BanditsYuta Natsubori, Masataka Ushiku, Yuta SaitoICLR 2025
- Off-Policy Learning with Limited SupplyKoichi Tanaka, Ren Kishimoto, Bushun Kawagishi, Yusuke Narita et al.WWW 2026
- Off-policy Evaluation for Multiple Actions in the Presence of Unobserved ConfoundersHaolin Wang, Lin Liu, Jiuyong Li, Ziqi Xu et al.WWW 2025 · 1 citation
- Counterfactual Learning with General Data-Generating PoliciesYusuke Narita, Kyohei Okumura, Akihiro Shimizu, Kohei YataAAAI 2023 · 2 citations
- PAC-Bayesian Offline Contextual Bandits With GuaranteesOtmane Sakhi, Pierre Alquier, Nicolas ChopinICML 2023 · 23 citations
