Off-policy Evaluation for Multiple Actions in the Presence of Unobserved Confounders
Haolin Wang, Lin Liu, Jiuyong Li, Ziqi Xu, Jixue Liu, Zehong Cao, Debo Cheng
Abstract
Off-policy evaluation (OPE) is a crucial problem in reinforcement learning (RL), where the goal is to estimate the long-term cumulative reward of a target policy using historical data generated by a potentially different behaviour policy. In many real-world applications, such as precision medicine and recommendation systems, unobserved confounders may influence the action, reward, and state transition dynamics, which leads to biased estimates if not properly addressed. While existing methods for handling unobserved confounders in OPE focus on single-action settings, they are less effective in multi-action scenarios commonly found in practical applications, where an agent can take multiple actions simultaneously. In this paper, we propose a novel auxiliary variable-aided method for OPE in multi-action settings with unobserved confounders. Our approach overcomes the limitations of traditional auxiliary variable methods for multi-action scenarios by requiring only a single auxiliary variable, relaxing the need for as many auxiliary variables as the actions. Through theoretical analysis, we prove that our method provides an unbiased estimation of the target policy value. Empirical evaluations demonstrate that our estimator achieves better performance compared to existing baseline methods, highlighting its effectiveness and reliability in addressing unobserved confounders in multi-action OPE settings.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b05ceb0b-53da-4cc2-9ae9-961c737253d7Builds on11
- CoinDICE: Off-Policy Confidence Interval EstimationBo Dai, Ofir Nachum, Yinlam Chow, Lihong Li et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 96 citations
- Off-policy Policy Evaluation For Sequential Decisions Under Unobserved ConfoundingHongseok Namkoong, Ramtin Keramati, Steve Yadlowsky, Emma BrunskillNeurIPS 2020 · 81 citations
- Confounding-Robust Policy Evaluation in Infinite-Horizon Reinforcement LearningNathan Kallus, Angela ZhouNeurIPS 2020 · 78 citations
- Doubly Robust Bias Reduction in Infinite Horizon Off-Policy EstimationZiyang Tang, Yihao Feng, Lihong Li, Dengyong Zhou et al.ICLR 2020 · 72 citations
- Accountable Off-Policy Evaluation With Kernel Bellman StatisticsYihao Feng, Tongzheng Ren, Ziyang Tang, Qiang LiuICML 2020 · 45 citations
Related papers
- An Instrumental Variable Approach to Confounded Off-Policy EvaluationYang Xu, Jin Zhu, Chengchun Shi, Shikai Luo et al.ICML 2023 · 24 citations
- Two-way Deconfounder for Off-policy Evaluation in Causal Reinforcement LearningShuguang Yu, Shuxing Fang, Ruixin Peng, Zhengling Qi et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 9 citations
- Model-Free and Model-Based Policy Evaluation when Causality is UncertainDavid Bruns-SmithICML 2021 · 14 citations
- Efficient and Sharp Off-Policy Learning under Unobserved ConfoundingKonstantin Hess, Dennis Frauen, Valentyn Melnychuk, Stefan FeuerriegelICLR 2026 · 5 citations
- Confounding Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Causal ApproachMingxuan Li, Junzhe Zhang, Elias BareinboimNeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
