RSPO: Regularized Self-Play Alignment of Large Language Models
Xiaohang Tang, Sangwoong Yoon, Seongho Son, Huizhuo Yuan, Quanquan Gu, Ilija Bogunovic
Abstract
Self-play alignment has emerged as an effective approach for fine-tuning large language models (LLMs), formulating preference optimization as a two-player game. However, the regularization with respect to the reference policy, which is crucial for mitigating over-optimization, has been insufficiently investigated in self-play alignment. To study the impact of different regularization strategies, we propose Regularized Self-Play Policy Optimization (RSPO), a general and modular framework that unifies prior methods and enables simple plug-and-play integration of various regularizers, meanwhile preserving convergence to Nash equilibrium of the corresponding regularized game.Our empirical study involving over 120 fine-tuned Mistral-7B-Instruct models reveals that forward KL divergence regularization reduces response length, whereas reverse KL divergence markedly improves raw win rates. Crucially, RSPO regularized with a linear combination of forward and reverse KL divergence significantly boosts the length-controlled win rate on AlpacaEval-2 from 28.5% (unregularized self-play, SPPO) to 35.4%, and consistently demonstrates superior performance on Arena-Hard, MT-Bench, ArmoRM scores, and response diversity. Combining simplicity, convergence guarantees, and significant empirical gains, RSPO offers a strong foundation for exploring regularized self-play in language model alignment.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3fb9c93e-2b0b-46f8-b5fc-e299a2eef904Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on21
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-constraintWei Xiong, Hanze Dong, Chenlu Ye, Ziqi Wang et al.ICML 2024 · 346 citations
- Statistical Rejection Sampling Improves Preference OptimizationTianqi Liu, Yao Zhao, Rishabh Joshi, Misha Khalman et al.ICLR 2024 · 346 citations
- Iterative Reasoning Preference OptimizationRichard Yuanzhe Pang, Weizhe Yuan, He He, Kyunghyun Cho et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 287 citations
Related papers
- Self-Play Preference Optimization for Language Model AlignmentYue Wu, Zhiqing Sun, Huizhuo Yuan, Kaixuan Ji et al.ICLR 2025
- -SPPO: Semantic-Calibrated Self-Play Preference OptimizationXiwen Chen, Wenhui Zhu, Jingjing Wang, Peijie Qiu et al.ICML 2026
- Achieving Logarithmic Regret in KL-Regularized Zero-Sum Markov GamesAnupam Nayak, Tong Yang, Osman Yagan, Gauri Joshi et al.ICML 2026 · 9 citations
- AlphaDPO: Adaptive Reward Margin for Direct Preference OptimizationJunkang Wu, Xue Wang, Zhengyi Yang, Jiancan Wu et al.ICML 2025
- Normalized Rewards for Preference OptimizationShawn Im, Federico Danieli, Skyler Seto, Barry-John Theobald et al.ICML 2026 · 571 citations
