Right Now, Wrong Then: Non-Stationary Direct Preference Optimization under Preference Drift
Seongho Son, William Bankes, Sayak Ray Chowdhury, Brooks Paige, Ilija Bogunovic
Abstract
Current Large Language Model (LLM) preference optimization algorithms do not account for temporal preference drift, which can lead to severe misalignment. To address this limitation, we propose Non-Stationary Direct Preference Optimisation (NS-DPO) that models time-dependent reward functions with a Dynamic Bradley-Terry model. NS-DPO proposes a computationally efficient solution by introducing only a single discount parameter in the loss function, which is used for exponential weighting that proportionally focuses learning on more time-relevant datapoints.
We theoretically analyze the convergence of NS-DPO in a general setting where the exact nature of the preference drift is not known, providing upper bounds on the estimation error and regret caused by non-stationary preferences. Finally, we demonstrate the effectiveness of NS-DPO for finetuning LLMs under drifting preferences. Using scenarios where various levels of preference drift is introduced, with popular LLM reward models and datasets, we show that NS-DPO fine-tuned LLMs remain robust under non-stationarity, significantly outperforming baseline algorithms that ignore temporal preference changes, without sacrificing performance in stationary cases.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6c98bfc0-d02e-4434-8d6f-3f62760a29eeCited by top-tier papers4
- Reasoning Is Not Free: Robust Adaptive Cost-Efficient Routing for LLM-as-a-JudgeWenbo Zhang, Lijinghua Zhang, Liner Xiang, Hengrui CaiICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Autoregressive Direct Preference OptimizationMasanari Oi, Mahiro Ukai, Masahiro Kaneko, Naoaki Okazaki et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Distributionally Robust Reinforcement Learning from Human FeedbackDebmalya Mandal, Paulius Sasnauskas, Goran RadanovicICML 2026
- Online Compatible Reward Identification from Preference FeedbackSimone Drago, Marco Mussi, Alberto Maria MetelliICML 2026
Builds on31
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Safe RLHF: Safe Reinforcement Learning from Human FeedbackJosef Dai, Xuehai Pan, Ruiyang Sun, Jiaming Ji et al.ICLR 2024 · 656 citations
- Self-Rewarding Language ModelsWeizhe Yuan, Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Kyunghyun Cho, Xian Li et al.ICML 2024 · 569 citations
- Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language ModelsZixiang Chen, Yihe Deng, Huizhuo Yuan, Kaixuan Ji et al.ICML 2024 · 527 citations
Related papers
- Token-level Direct Preference OptimizationYongcheng Zeng, Guoqing Liu, Weiyu Ma, Ning Yang et al.ICML 2024 · 136 citations
- Doubly Robust Alignment for Large Language ModelsErhan Xu, Kai Ye, Hongyi Zhou, Luhan Zhu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 14 citations
- Risk-aware Direct Preference Optimization under Nested Risk MeasureLijun Zhang, Lin Li, Yajie Qi, Huizhong Song et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- Provably Mitigating Overoptimization in RLHF: Your SFT Loss is Implicitly an Adversarial RegularizerZhihan Liu, Miao Lu, Shenao Zhang, Boyi Liu et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 119 citations
- Zeroth-Order Policy Gradient for Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback without Reward InferenceQining Zhang, Lei YingICLR 2025
